241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199214)
1. Characteristic 8 keV X rays possess radiobiological properties of higher-LET radiation.
Shridhar R; Estabrook W; Yudelev M; Rakowski J; Burmeister J; Wilson GD; Joiner MC
Radiat Res; 2010 Mar; 173(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 20199214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks in Chinese hamster V79-4 cells irradiated with characteristic aluminum K and copper L ultrasoft X rays.
Botchway SW; Stevens DL; Hill MA; Jenner TJ; O'Neill P
Radiat Res; 1997 Oct; 148(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 9339947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Monte Carlo simulation of DNA damage induction by x-rays and selected radioisotopes.
Hsiao Y; Stewart RD
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Jan; 53(1):233-44. PubMed ID: 18182699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Relative biological effectiveness of high linear energy transfer α-particles for the induction of DNA-double-strand breaks, chromosome aberrations and reproductive cell death in SW-1573 lung tumour cells.
Franken NA; Hovingh S; Ten Cate R; Krawczyk P; Stap J; Hoebe R; Aten J; Barendsen GW
Oncol Rep; 2012 Mar; 27(3):769-74. PubMed ID: 22200791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
Hunter N; Muirhead CR
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Determination of the relative biological effectiveness and oxygen enhancement ratio for micronuclei formation using high-LET radiation in solid tumor cells: An in vitro and in vivo study.
Hirayama R; Uzawa A; Obara M; Takase N; Koda K; Ozaki M; Noguchi M; Matsumoto Y; Li H; Yamashita K; Koike S; Ando K; Shirai T; Matsufuji N; Furusawa Y
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2015 Nov; 793():41-7. PubMed ID: 26520371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhanced neoplastic transformation by mammography X rays relative to 200 kVp X rays: indication for a strong dependence on photon energy of the RBE(M) for various end points.
Frankenberg D; Kelnhofer K; Bär K; Frankenberg-Schwager M
Radiat Res; 2002 Jan; 157(1):99-105. PubMed ID: 11754647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lung cancer cell line screen links fanconi anemia/BRCA pathway defects to increased relative biological effectiveness of proton radiation.
Liu Q; Ghosh P; Magpayo N; Testa M; Tang S; Gheorghiu L; Biggs P; Paganetti H; Efstathiou JA; Lu HM; Held KD; Willers H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Apr; 91(5):1081-9. PubMed ID: 25832698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Track-average LET of secondary electrons generated in LiF:Mg,Ti and liquid water by 20-300 kV x-ray,
Cabrera-Santiago A; Massillon-Jl G
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Nov; 61(22):7919-7933. PubMed ID: 27779122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Spot Scanning and Passive Scattering Proton Therapy: Relative Biological Effectiveness and Oxygen Enhancement Ratio in Cultured Cells.
Iwata H; Ogino H; Hashimoto S; Yamada M; Shibata H; Yasui K; Toshito T; Omachi C; Tatekawa K; Manabe Y; Mizoe JE; Shibamoto Y
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 27084632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biological effectiveness of (12)C and (20)Ne ions with very high LET.
Czub J; Banaś D; Błaszczyk A; Braziewicz J; Buraczewska I; Choinski J; Gorak U; Jaskoła M; Korman A; Lankoff A; Lisowska H; Lukaszek A; Szeflinski Z; Wojcik A
Int J Radiat Biol; 2008 Oct; 84(10):821-9. PubMed ID: 18979317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biological effectiveness of radon-progeny alpha particles. IV. Morphological transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells at low doses.
Martin SG; Miller RC; Geard CR; Hall EJ
Radiat Res; 1995 Apr; 142(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 7899561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Constancy of the relative biological effectiveness of 42 MeV (p-->Be+) neutrons among cell lines with different DNA repair proficiencies.
Britten RA; Murray D
Radiat Res; 1997 Oct; 148(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 9339946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tumor induction in mice after local irradiation with single doses of either carbon-ion beams or gamma rays.
Ando K; Koike S; Ohmachi Y; Ando Y; Kobashi G
Int J Radiat Biol; 2014 Dec; 90(12):1119-24. PubMed ID: 24923475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calculation of relative biological effectiveness of a low-energy electronic brachytherapy source.
Reniers B; Liu D; Rusch T; Verhaegen F
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Dec; 53(24):7125-35. PubMed ID: 19033642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inactivation of C3H10T1/2 cells by low energy protons and deuterons.
Bettega D; Calzolari P; Marchesini R; Noris Chiorda GL; Piazzolla A; Tallone L; Cera F; Cherubini R; Dalla Vecchia M; Favaretto S; Tiveron P
Int J Radiat Biol; 1998 Mar; 73(3):303-9. PubMed ID: 9525259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Biological effect of carbon beams on cultured human cells].
Ka WJ; Ito H; Shigematsu N; Yamashita S; Kubo A; Kanai T
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Aug; 56(9):669-73. PubMed ID: 8831225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks and 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine-detectable sites in 40-75 kVp X-irradiated compared to 60Co gamma-irradiated human cell lines.
Mirzayans R; Waters R; Paterson MC
Radiat Res; 1988 Apr; 114(1):168-85. PubMed ID: 3353503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Induction of homologous recombination in the hprt gene of V79 Chinese hamster cells in response to low- and high-LET irradiation.
Olsson G; Czene S; Jenssen D; Harms-Ringdahl M
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2004; 104(1-4):227-31. PubMed ID: 15162043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction and disappearance of G2 chromatid breaks in lymphocytes after low doses of low-LET gamma-rays and high-LET fast neutrons.
Vral A; Thierens H; Baeyens A; De Ridder L
Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Apr; 78(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 12020436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
