345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199237)
1. Comparison of traditional versus video laryngoscopy in out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.
Wayne MA; McDonnell M
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(2):278-82. PubMed ID: 20199237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Macintosh laryngoscope blade for videolaryngoscopy reduces stylet use in patients with normal airways.
van Zundert A; Maassen R; Lee R; Willems R; Timmerman M; Siemonsma M; Buise M; Wiepking M
Anesth Analg; 2009 Sep; 109(3):825-31. PubMed ID: 19690253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy.
Macnair D; Baraclough D; Wilson G; Bloch M; Engelhardt T
Paediatr Anaesth; 2009 Jun; 19(6):577-80. PubMed ID: 19645975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of video laryngoscopy use during urgent endotracheal intubation in the critically ill.
Kory P; Guevarra K; Mathew JP; Hegde A; Mayo PH
Anesth Analg; 2013 Jul; 117(1):144-9. PubMed ID: 23687228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Success rates and endotracheal tube insertion times of experienced emergency physicians using five video laryngoscopes: a randomised trial in a simulated trapped car accident victim.
Wetsch WA; Carlitscheck M; Spelten O; Teschendorf P; Hellmich M; Genzwürker HV; Hinkelbein J
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2011 Dec; 28(12):849-58. PubMed ID: 21986981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Paramedic laryngoscopy in the simulated difficult airway: comparison of the Venner A.P. Advance and GlideScope Ranger video laryngoscopes.
Butchart AG; Tjen C; Garg A; Young P
Acad Emerg Med; 2011 Jul; 18(7):692-8. PubMed ID: 21762232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvement in glottic visualisation by using the C-MAC PM video laryngoscope as a first-line device for out-of-hospital emergency tracheal intubation: An observational study.
Hossfeld B; Frey K; Doerges V; Lampl L; Helm M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2015 Jun; 32(6):425-31. PubMed ID: 25886716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope.
Serocki G; Bein B; Scholz J; Dörges V
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Jan; 27(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 19809328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized comparison of the use of an optical compared with a rigid laryngoscope on the success rate of novices performing tracheal intubation.
de Oliveira GS; Fitzgerald PC; Beckerly R; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2011 Mar; 112(3):615-8. PubMed ID: 21233492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: the Macintosh laryngoscope blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients.
Maassen R; Lee R; Hermans B; Marcus M; van Zundert A
Anesth Analg; 2009 Nov; 109(5):1560-5. PubMed ID: 19713258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative effectiveness of the C-MAC video laryngoscope versus direct laryngoscopy in the setting of the predicted difficult airway.
Aziz MF; Dillman D; Fu R; Brambrink AM
Anesthesiology; 2012 Mar; 116(3):629-36. PubMed ID: 22261795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is video laryngoscope-assisted flexible tracheoscope intubation feasible for patients with predicted difficult airway? A prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Lenhardt R; Burkhart MT; Brock GN; Kanchi-Kandadai S; Sharma R; Akça O
Anesth Analg; 2014 Jun; 118(6):1259-65. PubMed ID: 24842175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Use of the GlideScope video laryngoscope in 50 pediatric patients].
Otsuka Y; Hirabayashi Y; Okada O; Sato Y; Taga N; Takeuchi M
Masui; 2010 Jun; 59(6):696-700. PubMed ID: 20560367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tracheal intubation by non-anesthesia residents using the Pentax-AWS airway scope and Macintosh laryngoscope.
Hirabayashi Y; Seo N
J Clin Anesth; 2009 Jun; 21(4):268-71. PubMed ID: 19502032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Direct versus video laryngoscopic intubation by novice prehospital intubators with and without chest compressions: A pilot manikin study.
Kim YM; Kang HG; Kim JH; Chung HS; Yim HW; Jeong SH
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 21034232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficacy of the Storz Miller 1 video laryngoscope in a simulated infant difficult intubation.
Fiadjoe JE; Stricker PA; Hackell RS; Salam A; Gurnaney H; Rehman MA; Litman RS
Anesth Analg; 2009 Jun; 108(6):1783-6. PubMed ID: 19448202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Video-intuboscopic monitoring of tracheal intubation in pediatric patients.
Weiss M; Schwarz U; Dillier CM; Gerber AC
Can J Anaesth; 2000 Dec; 47(12):1202-6. PubMed ID: 11132742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Comparison of Paramedic First Pass Endotracheal Intubation Success Rate of the VividTrac VT-A 100, GlideScope Ranger, and Direct Laryngoscopy Under Simulated Prehospital Cervical Spinal Immobilization Conditions in a Cadaveric Model.
Hodnick R; Zitek T; Galster K; Johnson S; Bledsoe B; Ebbs D
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2017 Dec; 32(6):621-624. PubMed ID: 28807073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope.
Tremblay MH; Williams S; Robitaille A; Drolet P
Anesth Analg; 2008 May; 106(5):1495-500, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18420866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial.
Yeatts DJ; Dutton RP; Hu PF; Chang YW; Brown CH; Chen H; Grissom TE; Kufera JA; Scalea TM
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2013 Aug; 75(2):212-9. PubMed ID: 23823612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
