354 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199567)
1. The adaptation rate of asexuals: deleterious mutations, clonal interference and population bottlenecks.
Campos PR; Wahl LM
Evolution; 2010 Jul; 64(7):1973-83. PubMed ID: 20199567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of population bottlenecks on clonal interference, and the adaptation effective population size.
Campos PR; Wahl LM
Evolution; 2009 Apr; 63(4):950-8. PubMed ID: 19210533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Limits to adaptation in asexual populations.
de Visser JA; Rozen DE
J Evol Biol; 2005 Jul; 18(4):779-88. PubMed ID: 16033549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental heterogeneity enhances clonal interference.
Campos PR; Neto PS; de Oliveira VM; Gordo I
Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1390-9. PubMed ID: 18363863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolutionary genetics: a piggyback ride to adaptation and diversity.
Zeyl C
Curr Biol; 2007 May; 17(9):R333-5. PubMed ID: 17470349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The speed of adaptation in large asexual populations.
Wilke CO
Genetics; 2004 Aug; 167(4):2045-53. PubMed ID: 15342539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. High mutation rates, bottlenecks, and robustness of RNA viral quasispecies.
Manrubia SC; Escarmís C; Domingo E; Lázaro E
Gene; 2005 Mar; 347(2):273-82. PubMed ID: 15777632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Local effects of limited recombination: historical perspective and consequences for population estimates of adaptive evolution.
Williford A; Comeron JM
J Hered; 2010; 101 Suppl 1():S127-34. PubMed ID: 20421321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evolutionary feedbacks between reproductive mode and mutation rate exacerbate the paradox of sex.
Sloan DB; Panjeti VG
Evolution; 2010 Apr; 64(4):1129-35. PubMed ID: 19863589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mutational effects on the clonal interference phenomenon.
Campos PR; de Oliveira VM
Evolution; 2004 May; 58(5):932-7. PubMed ID: 15212374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fitness effects of beneficial mutations: the mutational landscape model in experimental evolution.
Betancourt AJ; Bollback JP
Curr Opin Genet Dev; 2006 Dec; 16(6):618-23. PubMed ID: 17055718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populations.
Keightley PD; Otto SP
Nature; 2006 Sep; 443(7107):89-92. PubMed ID: 16957730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid evolutionary escape by large populations from local fitness peaks is likely in nature.
Weinreich DM; Chao L
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1175-82. PubMed ID: 16050095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Adaptation in sexuals vs. asexuals: clonal interference and the Fisher-Muller model.
Kim Y; Orr HA
Genetics; 2005 Nov; 171(3):1377-86. PubMed ID: 16020775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating the optimal bottleneck ratio for experimental evolution: the burst-death model.
Hubbarde JE; Wahl LM
Math Biosci; 2008 Jun; 213(2):113-8. PubMed ID: 18472113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effects of sex and mutation rate on adaptation in test tubes and to mouse hosts by Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Grimberg B; Zeyl C
Evolution; 2005 Feb; 59(2):431-8. PubMed ID: 15807427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptive evolution in a spatially structured asexual population.
Gordo I; Campos PR
Genetica; 2006 May; 127(1-3):217-29. PubMed ID: 16850226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why sex and recombination?
Barton NH
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol; 2009; 74():187-95. PubMed ID: 19903748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recombination enhances protein adaptation in Drosophila melanogaster.
Presgraves DC
Curr Biol; 2005 Sep; 15(18):1651-6. PubMed ID: 16169487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Speciation through competition: a critical review.
Polechová J; Barton NH
Evolution; 2005 Jun; 59(6):1194-210. PubMed ID: 16050097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
