223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199692)
21. Consumers' experiences and values in conventional and alternative medicine paradigms: a problem detection study (PDS).
Emmerton L; Fejzic J; Tett SE
BMC Complement Altern Med; 2012 Apr; 12():39. PubMed ID: 22490367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Presenting risk information to people with diabetes: evaluating effects and preferences for different formats by a web-based randomised controlled trial.
Edwards A; Thomas R; Williams R; Ellner AL; Brown P; Elwyn G
Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Nov; 63(3):336-49. PubMed ID: 16860964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Developing alternative over-the-counter medicine label formats: How do they compare when evaluated by consumers?
Tong V; Raynor DK; Aslani P
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2018 Mar; 14(3):248-261. PubMed ID: 28546037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Cardiovascular risk factors. Different evaluations by physicians and patients].
Bjerrum L; Hamm LR; Toft B; Munck AP; Kragstrup J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2002 Nov; 164(46):5382-6. PubMed ID: 12469384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Preferences and Perspectives of Australian General Practitioners Towards a New "Four-in-One" Risk Assessment Tool for Preventative Health: The LEAD! GP Project.
Chong TWH; Rego T; Lai R; Westphal A; Pond CD; Curran E; Kootar S; Peters R; Anstey KJ; Lautenschlager NT
J Alzheimers Dis; 2023; 94(2):801-814. PubMed ID: 37334606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A Survey of GPs Awareness and Use of Risk Assessment Tools and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Guidelines.
Byrne D; O'Connor L; Jennings S; Bennett K; Murphy AW
Ir Med J; 2015; 108(7):204-7. PubMed ID: 26349349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Communicating effectiveness of intervention for chronic diseases: what single format can replace comprehensive information?
Stovring H; Gyrd-Hansen D; Kristiansen IS; Nexoe J; Nielsen JB
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2008 Jun; 8():25. PubMed ID: 18565218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Attitudes, norms and controls influencing lifestyle risk factor management in general practice.
Ampt AJ; Amoroso C; Harris MF; McKenzie SH; Rose VK; Taggart JR
BMC Fam Pract; 2009 Aug; 10():59. PubMed ID: 19706198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Tailoring risk communication to improve comprehension: Do patient preferences help or hurt?
Barnes AJ; Hanoch Y; Miron-Shatz T; Ozanne EM
Health Psychol; 2016 Sep; 35(9):1007-16. PubMed ID: 27183307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of different cardiovascular risk presentation formats on intentions, understanding and emotional affect: a randomised controlled trial using a web-based risk formatter (protocol).
Waldron CA; Gallacher J; van der Weijden T; Newcombe R; Elwyn G
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2010 Jul; 10():41. PubMed ID: 20673347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. General practitioner perceptions of assessment and reporting of absolute cardiovascular disease risk via pathology services: a qualitative study.
Chapman N; McWhirter RE; Schultz MG; Ezzy D; Nelson MR; Sharman JE
Fam Pract; 2021 Mar; 38(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 33002138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. What's good and bad about contraceptive products?: a best-worst attribute experiment comparing the values of women consumers and GPs.
Knox SA; Viney RC; Street DJ; Haas MR; Fiebig DG; Weisberg E; Bateson D
Pharmacoeconomics; 2012 Dec; 30(12):1187-202. PubMed ID: 23078190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cardiovascular risk assessment in Australian general practice.
Gupta R; Stocks NP; Broadbent J
Aust Fam Physician; 2009 May; 38(5):364-8. PubMed ID: 19458809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Improving cardiovascular risk management: a randomized, controlled trial on the effect of a decision support tool for patients and physicians.
van Steenkiste B; van der Weijden T; Stoffers HE; Kester AD; Timmermans DR; Grol R
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 14(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 17301626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Designing a decision aid for cancer prevention: a qualitative study.
Milton S; Macrae F; McIntosh JG; Saya S; Alphonse P; Yogaparan T; Karnchanachari N; Novy K; Nguyen P; Lau P; Emery J
Fam Pract; 2024 Jun; 41(3):349-359. PubMed ID: 37058423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Identifying patient preferences for communicating risk estimates: a descriptive pilot study.
Fortin JM; Hirota LK; Bond BE; O'Connor AM; Col NF
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2001; 1():2. PubMed ID: 11545684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How do GPs want to learn in the digital era?
Yee M; Simpson-Young V; Paton R; Zuo Y
Aust Fam Physician; 2014 Jun; 43(6):399-402. PubMed ID: 24897992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Influence of sugar label formats on consumer understanding and amount of sugar in food choices: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
Scapin T; Fernandes AC; Curioni CC; Pettigrew S; Neal B; Coyle DH; Rodrigues VM; Bernardo GL; Uggioni PL; Proença RPC
Nutr Rev; 2021 Jun; 79(7):788-801. PubMed ID: 33313917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Providing healthcare for people with chronic illness: the views of Australian GPs.
Oldroyd J; Proudfoot J; Infante FA; Powell Davies G; Bubner T; Holton C; Beilby JJ; Harris MF
Med J Aust; 2003 Jul; 179(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 12831381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Do Preferred Risk Formats Lead to Better Understanding? A Multicenter Controlled Trial on Communicating Familial Breast Cancer Risks Using Different Risk Formats.
Henneman L; van Asperen CJ; Oosterwijk JC; Menko FH; Claassen L; Timmermans DR
Patient Prefer Adherence; 2020; 14():333-342. PubMed ID: 32109999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
