These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20199912)

  • 1. Magnetic resonance poroelastography: an algorithm for estimating the mechanical properties of fluid-saturated soft tissues.
    Perriñez PR; Kennedy FE; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2010 Mar; 29(3):746-55. PubMed ID: 20199912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast detection in fluid-saturated media with magnetic resonance poroelastography.
    Perriñez PR; Pattison AJ; Kennedy FE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    Med Phys; 2010 Jul; 37(7):3518-26. PubMed ID: 20831058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modeling of soft poroelastic tissue in time-harmonic MR elastography.
    Perriñez PR; Kennedy FE; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Mar; 56(3):598-608. PubMed ID: 19272864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A numerical framework for interstitial fluid pressure imaging in poroelastic MRE.
    Tan L; McGarry MDJ; Van Houten EEW; Ji M; Solamen L; Zeng W; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178521. PubMed ID: 28586393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Poroelastography: imaging the poroelastic properties of tissues.
    Konofagou EE; Harrigan TP; Ophir J; Krouskop TA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Oct; 27(10):1387-97. PubMed ID: 11731052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shear modulus decomposition algorithm in magnetic resonance elastography.
    Kwon OI; Park C; Nam HS; Woo EJ; Seo JK; Glaser KJ; Manduca A; Ehman RL
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2009 Oct; 28(10):1526-33. PubMed ID: 19783495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spatially-resolved hydraulic conductivity estimation via poroelastic magnetic resonance elastography.
    Pattison AJ; McGarry M; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Jun; 33(6):1373-80. PubMed ID: 24771571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of frequency- and direction-dependent elastic materials on linearly elastic MRE image reconstructions.
    Perreard IM; Pattison AJ; Doyley M; McGarry MD; Barani Z; Van Houten EE; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Nov; 55(22):6801-15. PubMed ID: 21030746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimization of a Pixel-to-Pixel Curve-Fitting Method for Poroelastography Imaging.
    Galaz BA; Acevedo RH
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jan; 43(1):309-322. PubMed ID: 27765386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance analysis of a new real-time elastographic time constant estimator.
    Nair SP; Yang X; Krouskop TA; Righetti R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2011 Feb; 30(2):497-511. PubMed ID: 20952333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The feasibility of estimating and imaging the mechanical behavior of poroelastic materials using axial strain elastography.
    Righetti R; Righetti M; Ophir J; Krouskop TA
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3241-59. PubMed ID: 17505100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A New Method for Estimating the Effective Poisson's Ratio in Ultrasound Poroelastography.
    Islam MT; Chaudhry A; Tang S; Tasciotti E; Righetti R
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2018 May; 37(5):1178-1191. PubMed ID: 29727281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: I. Theoretical foundation.
    Berry GP; Bamber JC; Armstrong CG; Miller NR; Barbone PE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Apr; 32(4):547-67. PubMed ID: 16616601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A regularization-free elasticity reconstruction method for ultrasound elastography with freehand scan.
    Pan X; Liu K; Bai J; Luo J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():132. PubMed ID: 25194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A New Class of Phantom Materials for Poroelastography Imaging Techniques.
    Chaudhry A; Yazdi IK; Kongari R; Tasciotti E; Righetti R
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 May; 42(5):1230-8. PubMed ID: 26806439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Towards an acoustic model-based poroelastic imaging method: II. experimental investigation.
    Berry GP; Bamber JC; Miller NR; Barbone PE; Bush NL; Armstrong CG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 32(12):1869-85. PubMed ID: 17169699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A regularization-free Young's modulus reconstruction algorithm for ultrasound elasticity imaging.
    Pan X; Gao J; Shao J; Luo J; Bai J
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():1132-5. PubMed ID: 24109892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Spline Interpolation-based Data Reconstruction Technique for Estimation of Strain Time Constant in Ultrasound Poroelastography.
    Islam MT; Righetti R
    Ultrason Imaging; 2020 Jan; 42(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 31937211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the soft tissue ultrasound elastography using FEM based inversion approach.
    Eshaghinia SS; Taghvaeipour A; Aghdam MM; Rivaz H
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2024 Mar; 238(3):271-287. PubMed ID: 38240143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suitability of poroelastic and viscoelastic mechanical models for high and low frequency MR elastography.
    McGarry MD; Johnson CL; Sutton BP; Georgiadis JG; Van Houten EE; Pattison AJ; Weaver JB; Paulsen KD
    Med Phys; 2015 Feb; 42(2):947-57. PubMed ID: 25652507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.