155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20200105)
1. VIEWDEX: an efficient and easy-to-use software for observer performance studies.
Håkansson M; Svensson S; Zachrisson S; Svalkvist A; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):42-51. PubMed ID: 20200105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. VIEWDEX: A STATUS REPORT.
Svalkvist A; Svensson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):38-45. PubMed ID: 26822421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A software tool for increased efficiency in observer performance studies in radiology.
Börjesson S; Håkansson M; Båth M; Kheddache S; Svensson S; Tingberg A; Grahn A; Ruschin M; Hemdal B; Mattsson S; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):45-52. PubMed ID: 15933080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development of a customizable software application for medical imaging analysis and visualization.
Martinez-Escobar M; Peloquin C; Juhnke B; Peddicord J; Jose S; Noon C; Foo JL; Winer E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2011; 163():343-7. PubMed ID: 21335815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems.
Metz CE
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):413-22. PubMed ID: 17412096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of location specific observer performance data: validated extensions of the jackknife free-response (JAFROC) method.
Chakraborty DP
Acad Radiol; 2006 Oct; 13(10):1187-93. PubMed ID: 16979067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. VIEWDEX 3.0-RECENT DEVELOPMENT OF A SOFTWARE APPLICATION FACILITATING ASSESSMENT OF IMAGE QUALITY AND OBSERVER PERFORMANCE.
Svalkvist A; Svensson S; Hagberg T; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2021 Oct; 195(3-4):372-377. PubMed ID: 33683321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computational framework for simulating fluorescence microscope images with cell populations.
Lehmussola A; Ruusuvuori P; Selinummi J; Huttunen H; Yli-Harja O
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Jul; 26(7):1010-6. PubMed ID: 17649914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The development and validation of the Virtual Tissue Matrix, a software application that facilitates the review of tissue microarrays on line.
Conway CM; O'Shea D; O'Brien S; Lawler DK; Dodrill GD; O'Grady A; Barrett H; Gulmann C; O'Driscoll L; Gallagher WM; Kay EW; O'Shea DG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 May; 7():256. PubMed ID: 16707006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optimization of restricted ROC surfaces in three-class classification tasks.
Edwards DC; Metz CE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(10):1345-56. PubMed ID: 17948725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of a software package for automated quality assessment of contrast detail images--comparison with subjective visual assessment.
Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Honey I; Blake P
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5743-57. PubMed ID: 16306665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of content-based image retrieval systems in medical applications-clinical benefits and future directions.
Müller H; Michoux N; Bandon D; Geissbuhler A
Int J Med Inform; 2004 Feb; 73(1):1-23. PubMed ID: 15036075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What's the control in studies measuring the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) on observer performance?
Obuchowski NA; Meziane M; Dachman AH; Lieber ML; Mazzone PJ
Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):761-7. PubMed ID: 20457419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [A novel image processing and analysis system for medical images based on IDL language].
Tang M
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 26(4):725-30. PubMed ID: 19813597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of observer performance in known-location tasks for tomographic image reconstruction.
Yendiki A; Fessler JA
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2006 Jan; 25(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 16398412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Measuring observer performance in chest radiology: some experiences.
Potchen EJ
J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 17412097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Performance assessment of mammographic diagnostic systems: evolution of methods and their application to a digital image study].
Compagnone G; Ferruzzi K; Pierotti L; Vianello Vos C; Berardi P; Bergamini C
Radiol Med; 1999 Mar; 97(3):179-87. PubMed ID: 10363062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perceptually based FROC analysis.
Arora R; Kundel HL; Beam CA
Acad Radiol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1567-74. PubMed ID: 16321746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. ROC, LROC, FROC, AFROC: an alphabet soup.
He X; Frey E
J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Sep; 6(9):652-5. PubMed ID: 19720362
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. New discoveries of image display size on observer performance.
Gao J
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):407-8. PubMed ID: 16554218
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
