These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20200106)

  • 1. The effect of radiation dose reduction on clinical image quality in chest radiography of premature neonates using a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system.
    Carlander A; Hansson J; Söderberg J; Steneryd K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):275-80. PubMed ID: 20200106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cu filtration for dose reduction in neonatal chest imaging.
    Smans K; Struelens L; Smet M; Bosmans H; Vanhavere F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):281-6. PubMed ID: 20179072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a dual-side readout technique computed radiography system in chest radiography of premature neonates.
    Carlander A; Hansson J; Söderberg J; Steneryd K; Båth M
    Acta Radiol; 2008 May; 49(4):468-74. PubMed ID: 18415793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated tube voltage selection in thoracoabdominal computed tomography at high pitch using a third-generation dual-source scanner: image quality and radiation dose performance.
    Lurz M; Lell MM; Wuest W; Eller A; Scharf M; Uder M; May MS
    Invest Radiol; 2015 May; 50(5):352-60. PubMed ID: 25591129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computed radiography versus mobile direct radiography for bedside chest radiographs: impact of dose on image quality and reader agreement.
    De Boo DW; Weber M; Deurloo EE; Streekstra GJ; Freling NJ; Dongelmans DA; Schaefer-Prokop CM
    Clin Radiol; 2011 Sep; 66(9):826-32. PubMed ID: 21570679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Needle image plates compared to conventional CR in chest radiography: is dose reduction possible?
    Berger-Kulemann V; Pötter-Lang S; Gruber M; Berger R; Vonbank K; Weber M; Rabitsch W; Uffmann M
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4156-60. PubMed ID: 21798682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Direct detector radiography versus dual reading computed radiography: feasibility of dose reduction in chest radiography.
    Gruber M; Uffmann M; Weber M; Prokop M; Balassy C; Schaefer-Prokop C
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Jul; 16(7):1544-50. PubMed ID: 16404566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of clinical and physical measures of image quality in chest and pelvis computed radiography at different tube voltages.
    Sandborg M; Tingberg A; Ullman G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2006 Nov; 33(11):4169-75. PubMed ID: 17153395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of clinical image quality in feline chest radiography with a needle-image plate (NIP) storage phosphor system--an approach to the evaluation of image quality in neonatal radiography].
    Ludewig E; Hirsch W; Bosch B; Gäbler K; Sorge I; Succow D; Werrmann A; Gosch D
    Rofo; 2010 Feb; 182(2):122-32. PubMed ID: 19859865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. COMPARISON OF WIRELESS DETECTORS FOR DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS: IMAGE QUALITY AND DOSE.
    Mourik JE; van der Tol P; Veldkamp WJ; Geleijns J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):303-7. PubMed ID: 26535003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality dependency on system configuration and tube voltage in chest tomosynthesis—a visual grading study using an anthropomorphic chest phantom.
    Söderman C; Asplund S; Allansdotter Johnsson Å; Vikgren J; Rossi Norrlund R; Molnar D; Svalkvist A; Gunnar Månsson L; Båth M
    Med Phys; 2015 Mar; 42(3):1200-12. PubMed ID: 25735275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attenuation-based automatic kilovolt (kV)-selection in computed tomography of the chest: effects on radiation exposure and image quality.
    Eller A; Wuest W; Scharf M; Brand M; Achenbach S; Uder M; Lell MM
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):2386-91. PubMed ID: 24050878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose and perceived image quality in chest radiography.
    Veldkamp WJ; Kroft LJ; Geleijns J
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):209-17. PubMed ID: 19577393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Routine chest radiography using a flat-panel detector: image quality at standard detector dose and 33% dose reduction.
    Strotzer M; Völk M; Fründ R; Hamer O; Zorger N; Feuerbach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Jan; 178(1):169-71. PubMed ID: 11756114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing image quality of flat-panel chest radiography with storage phosphor radiography and film-screen radiography.
    Ganten M; Radeleff B; Kampschulte A; Daniels MD; Kauffmann GW; Hansmann J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Jul; 181(1):171-6. PubMed ID: 12818852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Optimisation of tube voltage for conventional urography using a Gd2O2S:Tb flat panel detector.
    Zachrisson S; Hansson J; Cederblad A; Geterud K; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):86-91. PubMed ID: 20223848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of AEC chamber selection on patient dose and image quality.
    Hawking N; Elmore A
    Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(5):411-9. PubMed ID: 19457845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.