These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20201067)

  • 1. Thermodynamic resolution: how do errors in modeled protein structures affect binding affinity predictions?
    Singh MK; Dominy BN
    Proteins; 2010 May; 78(7):1613-7. PubMed ID: 20201067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Molecular dynamics-solvated interaction energy studies of protein-protein interactions: the MP1-p14 scaffolding complex.
    Cui Q; Sulea T; Schrag JD; Munger C; Hung MN; Naïm M; Cygler M; Purisima EO
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Jun; 379(4):787-802. PubMed ID: 18479705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Structural artifacts in protein-ligand X-ray structures: implications for the development of docking scoring functions.
    Søndergaard CR; Garrett AE; Carstensen T; Pollastri G; Nielsen JE
    J Med Chem; 2009 Sep; 52(18):5673-84. PubMed ID: 19711919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein imperfections: separating intrinsic from extrinsic variation of torsion angles.
    Butterfoss GL; Richardson JS; Hermans J
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2005 Jan; 61(Pt 1):88-98. PubMed ID: 15608380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An extensive test of 14 scoring functions using the PDBbind refined set of 800 protein-ligand complexes.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Fang X; Wang S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2114-25. PubMed ID: 15554682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Carbohydrate-binding proteins: Dissecting ligand structures through solvent environment occupancy.
    Gauto DF; Di Lella S; Guardia CM; Estrin DA; Martí MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2009 Jun; 113(25):8717-24. PubMed ID: 19485380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards in silico lead optimization: scores from ensembles of protein/ligand conformations reliably correlate with biological activity.
    Popov VM; Yee WA; Anderson AC
    Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):375-87. PubMed ID: 17078091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Form follows function: shape analysis of protein cavities for receptor-based drug design.
    Weisel M; Proschak E; Kriegl JM; Schneider G
    Proteomics; 2009 Jan; 9(2):451-9. PubMed ID: 19142949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of input differences on the results of docking calculations.
    Feher M; Williams CI
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jul; 49(7):1704-14. PubMed ID: 19530660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating protein structures determined by structural genomics consortia.
    Bhattacharya A; Tejero R; Montelione GT
    Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):778-95. PubMed ID: 17186527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computation of the contribution from the cavity effect to protein-ligand binding free energy.
    Grigoriev FV; Gabin SN; Romanov AN; Sulimov VB
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Dec; 112(48):15355-60. PubMed ID: 18991438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. X-ray structures of small ligand-FKBP complexes provide an estimate for hydrophobic interaction energies.
    Burkhard P; Taylor P; Walkinshaw MD
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(4):953-62. PubMed ID: 10656803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High affinity fucose binding of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lectin PA-IIL: 1.0 A resolution crystal structure of the complex combined with thermodynamics and computational chemistry approaches.
    Mitchell EP; Sabin C; Snajdrová L; Pokorná M; Perret S; Gautier C; Hofr C; Gilboa-Garber N; Koca J; Wimmerová M; Imberty A
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(3):735-46. PubMed ID: 15573375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NMR investigations of protein-carbohydrate interactions: studies on the relevance of Trp/Tyr variations in lectin binding sites as deduced from titration microcalorimetry and NMR studies on hevein domains. Determination of the NMR structure of the complex between pseudohevein and N,N',N"-triacetylchitotriose.
    Asensio JL; Siebert HC; von Der Lieth CW; Laynez J; Bruix M; Soedjanaamadja UM; Beintema JJ; Cañada FJ; Gabius HJ; Jiménez-Barbero J
    Proteins; 2000 Aug; 40(2):218-36. PubMed ID: 10842338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Calculation of protein heat capacity from replica-exchange molecular dynamics simulations with different implicit solvent models.
    Yeh IC; Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Nov; 112(47):15064-73. PubMed ID: 18959439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.