These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20202356)
1. Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Khan NF; Harrison SE; Rose PW Br J Gen Pract; 2010 Mar; 60(572):e128-36. PubMed ID: 20202356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Implications of the problem orientated medical record (POMR) for research using electronic GP databases: a comparison of the Doctors Independent Network Database (DIN) and the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). Carey IM; Cook DG; De Wilde S; Bremner SA; Richards N; Caine S; Strachan DP; Hilton SR BMC Fam Pract; 2003 Sep; 4():14. PubMed ID: 14516473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cancer recording and mortality in the General Practice Research Database and linked cancer registries. Boggon R; van Staa TP; Chapman M; Gallagher AM; Hammad TA; Richards MA Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2013 Feb; 22(2):168-75. PubMed ID: 23239282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of the General Practice Research Database (GPRD) for respiratory epidemiology: a comparison with the 4th Morbidity Survey in General Practice (MSGP4). Hansell A; Hollowell J; Nichols T; McNiece R; Strachan D Thorax; 1999 May; 54(5):413-9. PubMed ID: 10212105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the diagnosis of autism in general practitioner records. Fombonne E; Heavey L; Smeeth L; Rodrigues LC; Cook C; Smith PG; Meng L; Hall AJ BMC Public Health; 2004 Mar; 4():5. PubMed ID: 15113435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying major congenital malformations in the UK General Practice Research Database (GPRD): a study reporting on the sensitivity and added value of photocopied medical records and free text in the GPRD. Charlton RA; Weil JG; Cunnington MC; de Vries CS Drug Saf; 2010 Sep; 33(9):741-50. PubMed ID: 20701407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validity of the general practice research database. Jick SS; Kaye JA; Vasilakis-Scaramozza C; Garcia Rodríguez LA; Ruigómez A; Meier CR; Schlienger RG; Black C; Jick H Pharmacotherapy; 2003 May; 23(5):686-9. PubMed ID: 12741446 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of diagnoses in the general practice research database. Herrett EL; Thomas SL; Smeeth L Br J Gen Pract; 2011 Jul; 61(588):438-9. PubMed ID: 21722461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The general practice research database: role in pharmacovigilance. Wood L; Martinez C Drug Saf; 2004; 27(12):871-81. PubMed ID: 15366975 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the General Practice Research Database congenital heart defects prevalence: comparison to United Kingdom national systems. Wurst KE; Ephross SA; Loehr J; Clark DW; Guess HA Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol; 2007 Apr; 79(4):309-16. PubMed ID: 17286297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How accurate are diagnoses for rheumatoid arthritis and juvenile idiopathic arthritis in the general practice research database? Thomas SL; Edwards CJ; Smeeth L; Cooper C; Hall AJ Arthritis Rheum; 2008 Sep; 59(9):1314-21. PubMed ID: 18759262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research. Lewis JD; Schinnar R; Bilker WB; Wang X; Strom BL Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Apr; 16(4):393-401. PubMed ID: 17066486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring disease prevalence: a comparison of musculoskeletal disease using four general practice consultation databases. Jordan K; Clarke AM; Symmons DP; Fleming D; Porcheret M; Kadam UT; Croft P Br J Gen Pract; 2007 Jan; 57(534):7-14. PubMed ID: 17244418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the UK General Practice Research Database for pharmacoepidemiology. García Rodríguez LA; Pérez Gutthann S Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1998 May; 45(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 9643612 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review. Herrett E; Thomas SL; Schoonen WM; Smeeth L; Hall AJ Br J Clin Pharmacol; 2010 Jan; 69(1):4-14. PubMed ID: 20078607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Coding diagnoses and procedures using a high-quality clinical database instead of a medical record review. van Walraven C; Demers SV J Eval Clin Pract; 2001 Aug; 7(3):289-97. PubMed ID: 11555087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Agreement between GPRD smoking data: a survey of general practitioners and a population-based survey. Lewis JD; Brensinger C Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2004 Jul; 13(7):437-41. PubMed ID: 15269927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality of morbidity coding in general practice computerized medical records: a systematic review. Jordan K; Porcheret M; Croft P Fam Pract; 2004 Aug; 21(4):396-412. PubMed ID: 15249528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The utility of the general practice research database to examine selected congenital heart defects: a validation study. Wurst KE; Ephross SA; Loehr J; Clark DW; Guess HA Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2007 Aug; 16(8):867-77. PubMed ID: 17563909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the recording of 30 common childhood conditions in the Doctor's Independent Network and General Practice Research Databases. De Wilde S; Carey IM; Bremner SA; Richards N; Hilton SR; Strachan DP; Cook DG Health Stat Q; 2004; (22):21-31. PubMed ID: 15704391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]