200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20202503)
1. Neurological malpractice and nonmalpractice liability.
Johnston JC
Neurol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):441-58. PubMed ID: 20202503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The expert witness in medical malpractice litigation: through the looking glass.
Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP
J Child Neurol; 2013 Apr; 28(4):484-501. PubMed ID: 23504251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.
Williams MA; Mackin GA; Beresford HR; Gordon J; Jacobson PL; McQuillen MP; Reimschisel TE; Taylor RM; Bernat JL; Rizzo M; Snyder RD; Sagsveen MG; Amery M; Brannon WL;
Neurology; 2006 Jan; 66(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 16401838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Malpractice issues in neurological surgery.
Fager CA
Surg Neurol; 2006 Apr; 65(4):416-21. PubMed ID: 16531218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A lawyer, thinking of the neuro fraternity, reflects upon recent judicial decisions.
Samuels A
Br J Neurosurg; 2004 Apr; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 15176551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Future legal issues in emergency medicine.
Dunn JD; Mayer TA
Emerg Med Clin North Am; 1993 Nov; 11(4):933-51. PubMed ID: 8404577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Developmental trends in the malpractice process. II: Legal process and legal malpractice].
Broglie MG
Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1992 Aug; 47(8):371-6. PubMed ID: 1413930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Expert witnesses: setting standards--improving credibility.
Botney M
Mo Med; 2006; 103(6):579-81. PubMed ID: 17256261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Statement on the physician expert witness.
Professional Liability Committee of the American College of Surgeons.
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2000 Jun; 85(6):24-5. PubMed ID: 11349541
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical Malpractice and the Neurologist: An Introduction.
Johnston JC; Sartwelle TP
Neurol Clin; 2023 Aug; 41(3):485-491. PubMed ID: 37407101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A proposal for addressing the effects of hindsight and positive outcome biases in medical malpractice cases.
Haskel MA
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J; 2007; 42(3):895-940. PubMed ID: 17687803
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The expert medical witness: concerns, limits, and remedies.
Spencer FC; Guice KS
Bull Am Coll Surg; 2000 Jun; 85(6):22-3. PubMed ID: 11349540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hot topics in risk management in neurologic practice.
Thiess DE; Sattin JA; Larriviere DG
Neurol Clin; 2010 May; 28(2):429-39. PubMed ID: 20202502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving patient safety: what can detailed case analysis tell us?
Nora LM; Studwell SL
Neurology; 2005 Oct; 65(8):1154-5. PubMed ID: 16247038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical malpractice and tort reform. Issue brief.
Davis J
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2010 Jan; ():1-38. PubMed ID: 20213900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Child neurologist as expert witness: a report of the Ethics and Practice Committees of the Child Neurology Society.
J Child Neurol; 1998 Aug; 13(8):398-401. PubMed ID: 9721896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Get even with a hired gun?
Johnson LJ
Med Econ; 2003 May; 80(9):120. PubMed ID: 12776626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomedical scientists and physicians as experts in federal courts.
Runkle D
Acad Med; 2001 Aug; 76(8):762-3. PubMed ID: 11500275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Guidelines for testimony for the speciality of interventional pain management.
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians
Pain Physician; 2010; 13(4):317-8. PubMed ID: 20648199
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Medicolegal aspects in medical practice.
Aggarwal V
J Indian Med Assoc; 2002 Dec; 100(12):687. PubMed ID: 12793629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
