These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2020251)
61. Responding to requests for non-beneficial treatment. Pope TM MD Advis; 2012; 5(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 22318297 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
62. [Blood product substitution in palliative care]. Alt-Epping B; Simon A; Nauck F Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2010 Oct; 135(42):2083-7. PubMed ID: 20941683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. [When should physicians refrain from treatment?]. Nord Med; 1991; 106(8-9):239-40; discussion 240-1. PubMed ID: 1923744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The Problems With Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment. Moore KA; Rubin EB; Halpern SD JAMA; 2016 Jan; 315(3):259-60. PubMed ID: 26784769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. CPR decision making: why Winspear needs to be challenged? Anthony-Pillai R J Med Ethics; 2017 Jul; 43(7):485-486. PubMed ID: 28331052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Limitation of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest: practice in Belgium and Austria. Martens P; Haymerle A; Sterz F; Vanhaute O; Calle P Resuscitation; 1997 Oct; 35(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 9316195 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. Physicians' attitude toward the withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment: A comparison between Korea, Japan, and China. Ryu JY; Bae H; Kenji H; Xiaomei Z; Kwon I; Ahn KJ Death Stud; 2016; 40(10):630-637. PubMed ID: 27572742 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Age and disability biases in pediatric resuscitation among future physicians. Zhong R; Knobe J; Feigenson N; Mercurio MR Clin Pediatr (Phila); 2011 Nov; 50(11):1001-4. PubMed ID: 21622686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Patients' rights and DNR decisions. Siegel A Imprint; 1991; 38(4):43-4. PubMed ID: 1748455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
70. Resuscitation. Shock study triggers call to ban ageist slurs. Payne D Nurs Times; 2000 May 4-10; 96(18):13. PubMed ID: 11961818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
71. Response. Luce JM Chest; 2015 Aug; 148(2):e70-e71. PubMed ID: 26238853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. Deel v. Syracuse Veterans Administration Medical Center. Bourke LH Issues Law Med; 1991; 7(1):99-101. PubMed ID: 1856076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. [Motivation for living wills can decrease the risk of meaningless medical measures]. Silfverskiöld B Lakartidningen; 1991 Jan; 88(4):222. PubMed ID: 1994166 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. Ethics roundtable. Providing care in an unacceptable environment. Baumrucker SJ; Sheldon JE; Stolick M; Oertli RK; Harrington D; Vandekieft G; Morris GM Am J Hosp Palliat Care; 2009 Dec-2010 Jan; 26(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 19923632 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. [A medical controversy on treatment withdrawal. Does the physician risk to be charged for killing? Only if he deviates from the medical society consensus]. Karlsson Y Lakartidningen; 1991 Apr; 88(15):1417-20. PubMed ID: 2020250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. Courts continue to wrestle with the Wanglie and the Lawrance cases. Hosp Ethics; 1991; 7(5):12-4. PubMed ID: 10114316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Brain Death: Legal Duties to Accommodate Religious Objections. Pope TM Chest; 2015 Aug; 148(2):e69. PubMed ID: 26238851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. The US Uniform Determination of Death Act: Will It Survive a Constitutional Challenge? Yanke G; Rady MY; Verheijde JL Chest; 2015 Aug; 148(2):e69-e70. PubMed ID: 26238852 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. The ethics of limiting treatment: DNR decisions. Nicholson LG Nurs Manage; 1991 Feb; 22(2):64H, 64J, 64L, 64P. PubMed ID: 1990339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Resuscitation. The ethical implications. Gibson P Nursing (Lond); 1991 Jan 10-23; 4(26):16-8. PubMed ID: 1852301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]