BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20203126)

  • 1. Automatic landmarking of cephalograms using active appearance models.
    Vucinić P; Trpovski Z; Sćepan I
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 20203126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Automatic cephalometric analysis.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Spampinato C
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jan; 78(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 18193970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of active shape models for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Hutton TJ; Cunningham S; Hammond P
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Oct; 22(5):499-508. PubMed ID: 11105406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Precision of cephalometric analysis via fully and semiautomatic evaluation of digital lateral cephalographs.
    Sommer T; Ciesielski R; Erbersdobler J; Orthuber W; Fischer-Brandies H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):401-6. PubMed ID: 19700534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An evaluation of cellular neural networks for the automatic identification of cephalometric landmarks on digital images.
    Leonardi R; Giordano D; Maiorana F
    J Biomed Biotechnol; 2009; 2009():717102. PubMed ID: 19753320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A method of cephalometric analysis].
    Shao JL
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1992 May; 27(3):140-2, 189. PubMed ID: 1292896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An approach for the automatic cephalometric landmark detection using mathematical morphology and active appearance models.
    Rueda S; Alcañiz M
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2006; 9(Pt 1):159-66. PubMed ID: 17354886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated 2-D cephalometric analysis on X-ray images by a model-based approach.
    Yue W; Yin D; Li C; Wang G; Xu T
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1615-23. PubMed ID: 16916096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development of cephalometric norms using a unified facial and dental approach.
    Anderson G; Fields HW; Beck M; Chacon G; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):612-8. PubMed ID: 16808567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tensor-based AAM with continuous variation estimation: application to variation-robust face recognition.
    Lee HS; Kim D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2009 Jun; 31(6):1102-16. PubMed ID: 19372613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of cephalometric landmarks on monitor-displayed radiographs with and without image emboss enhancement.
    Leonardi RM; Giordano D; Maiorana F; Greco M
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Jun; 32(3):242-7. PubMed ID: 20022892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Picture archiving and communications systems: a study of reliability of orthodontic cephalometric analysis.
    Tan SS; Ahmad S; Moles DR; Cunningham SJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Oct; 33(5):537-43. PubMed ID: 21106665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fully Automatic System for Accurate Localisation and Analysis of Cephalometric Landmarks in Lateral Cephalograms.
    Lindner C; Wang CW; Huang CT; Li CH; Chang SW; Cootes TF
    Sci Rep; 2016 Sep; 6():33581. PubMed ID: 27645567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability and validity of MicroScribe-3DXL system in comparison with radiographic cephalometric system: Angular measurements.
    Barmou MM; Hussain SF; Abu Hassan MI
    Int Orthod; 2018 Jun; 16(2):314-327. PubMed ID: 29673688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ceph-X: development and evaluation of 2D cephalometric system.
    Mosleh MA; Baba MS; Malek S; Almaktari RA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Dec; 17(Suppl 19):499. PubMed ID: 28155649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Developing an automatic lateral cephalometric landmark identification program and evaluating its performance.
    Rakhshan V; Rakhshan H; Sheibaninia A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2009; 12(4):327-43. PubMed ID: 20108870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Rudolph DJ; Sinclair PM; Coggins JM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Feb; 113(2):173-9. PubMed ID: 9484208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cephalometric measurements with digital versus conventional cephalometric analysis.
    Celik E; Polat-Ozsoy O; Toygar Memikoglu TU
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):241-6. PubMed ID: 19237509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the YEN angle.
    Neela PK; Mascarenhas R; Husain A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 19582259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.