These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Optimal local oscillator field for a monostatic coherent laser radar with a circular aperture. Frehlich RG Appl Opt; 1993 Aug; 32(24):4569-77. PubMed ID: 20830119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Heterodyne Doppler 1-microm lidar measurement of reduced effective telescope aperture due to atmospheric turbulence. Chan KP; Killinger DK; Sugimoto N Appl Opt; 1991 Jun; 30(18):2617-27. PubMed ID: 20700251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Signal current probability distribution for optical heterodyne receivers in the turbulent atmosphere. 1: theory. Churnside JH; McIntyre CM Appl Opt; 1978 Jul; 17(14):2141-7. PubMed ID: 20203747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Signal-to-noise ratio in squeezed-light laser radar. Rubin MA; Kaushik S Appl Opt; 2009 Aug; 48(23):4597-609. PubMed ID: 19668274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Imaging and target detection with a heterodyne-reception optical radar. Shapiro JH; Capron BA; Harney RC Appl Opt; 1981 Oct; 20(19):3292-313. PubMed ID: 20333146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Optimum local oscillator levels for coherent detection using photoconductors. Hunt JM; Holmes JF; Amzajerdian F Appl Opt; 1988 Aug; 27(15):3135-41. PubMed ID: 20531905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Enhanced three-dimensional reconstruction from confocal scanning microscope images. II. Depth discrimination versus signal-to-noise ratio in partially confocal images. Conchello JA; Kim JJ; Hansen EW Appl Opt; 1994 Jun; 33(17):3740-50. PubMed ID: 20885766 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Joint signal current probability distribution for optical heterodyne receiver arrays in the turbulent atmosphere. Churnside JH; McIntyre CM Appl Opt; 1979 Jul; 18(13):2315-22. PubMed ID: 20212652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Theory of optical heterodyne detection using the pyroelectric effect. Eng ST; Gudmundsen RA Appl Opt; 1970 Jan; 9(1):161-6. PubMed ID: 20076155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparative study of autodyne and heterodyne laser interferometry for imaging. Lacot E; Jacquin O; Roussely G; Hugon O; Guillet de Chatellus H J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2010 Nov; 27(11):2450-8. PubMed ID: 21045910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Experimental study on the 1550 nm all fiber heterodyne laser range finder. Yang F; He Y; Shang J; Chen W Appl Opt; 2009 Dec; 48(34):6575-82. PubMed ID: 19956312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reduction of phase-induced intensity noise in a fiber-based coherent Doppler lidar using polarization control. Rodrigo PJ; Pedersen C Opt Express; 2010 Mar; 18(5):5320-7. PubMed ID: 20389545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. System combining the best features of heterodyne and direct detection receivers. Brookner E Appl Opt; 1971 May; 10(5):1009-11. PubMed ID: 20094593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optical communication through random atmospheric turbulence. Laussade JP; Yariv A; Comly J Appl Opt; 1969 Aug; 8(8):1607-11. PubMed ID: 20072485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]