These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20204445)
1. Comparison of Copan eSwab with the Copan Venturi Transystem for the quantitative survival of Escherichia coli, Streptococcus agalactiae and Candida albicans. Nys S; Vijgen S; Magerman K; Cartuyvels R Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2010 Apr; 29(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 20204445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the Copan ESwab system with two Amies agar swab transport systems for maintenance of microorganism viability. Van Horn KG; Audette CD; Sebeck D; Tucker KA J Clin Microbiol; 2008 May; 46(5):1655-8. PubMed ID: 18353935 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Recovery of aerobic gram-negative bacteria from the Copan Eswab transport system after long-term storage. Tops SCM; Kolmus M; Wulms D; van Ingen J; Wertheim HFL; Kolwijck E Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2020 Sep; 98(1):115100. PubMed ID: 32622288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bacterial recovery and viability from three different swab transport systems. Tan TY; Ng LS; Sim DM; Cheng Y; Min MO Pathology; 2014 Apr; 46(3):230-3. PubMed ID: 24614721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of the Copan ESwab transport system for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a laboratory and clinical study. Smismans A; Verhaegen J; Schuermans A; Frans J Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2009 Oct; 65(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 19748420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of Group B Streptococcus Directly from Collected ESwab Samples by Use of the BD Max GBS Assay. Silbert S; Rocchetti TT; Gostnell A; Kubasek C; Widen R J Clin Microbiol; 2016 Jun; 54(6):1660-1663. PubMed ID: 27053670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of optimal storage temperature, time, and transport medium for detection of group B Streptococcus in StrepB carrot broth. Trotman-Grant A; Raney T; Dien Bard J J Clin Microbiol; 2012 Jul; 50(7):2446-9. PubMed ID: 22518853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of the walk-away specimen processor and ESwab for recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in prenatal screening specimens. Buchan BW; Olson WJ; Mackey TL; Ledeboer NA J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jun; 52(6):2166-8. PubMed ID: 24622104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extensive evaluation of fastidious anaerobic bacteria recovery from the Copan eSwab® transport system. Demuyser T; De Geyter D; Van Dorpe D; Vandoorslaer K; Wybo I J Microbiol Methods; 2018 Jan; 144():73-78. PubMed ID: 29146304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative survival of aerobic and anaerobic microorganisms in Port-A-Cul and Copan transport systems. Stoner KA; Rabe LK; Austin MN; Meyn LA; Hillier SL J Clin Microbiol; 2008 Aug; 46(8):2739-44. PubMed ID: 18579722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the Copan ESwab Transport System for Viability of Pathogenic Fungi by Use of a Modification of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Document M40-A2. Gandhi B; Summerbell R; Mazzulli T J Clin Microbiol; 2018 Feb; 56(2):. PubMed ID: 29167289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the Copan eSwab System with an Agar Swab Transport System for Maintenance of Fastidious Anaerobic Bacterium Viability. Tyrrell KL; Citron DM; Leoncio ES; Goldstein EJ J Clin Microbiol; 2016 May; 54(5):1364-7. PubMed ID: 26888906 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation and comparison of two Stuart's liquid swab transport systems tested by the CLSI M40 method. Van Horn KG; Rankin I Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2007 Aug; 26(8):583-6. PubMed ID: 17564731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical evaluation of the Copan ESwab for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection and culture of wounds. Saegeman V; Flamaing J; Muller J; Peetermans WE; Stuyck J; Verhaegen J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2011 Aug; 30(8):943-9. PubMed ID: 21298460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of 3 swab transport systems for direct release and recovery of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Van Horn KG; Audette CD; Tucker KA; Sebeck D Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 2008 Dec; 62(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 18814991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of FecalSwab and ESwab devices for storage and transportation of Diarrheagenic bacteria. Hirvonen JJ; Kaukoranta SS J Clin Microbiol; 2014 Jul; 52(7):2334-9. PubMed ID: 24740083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria in purulent clinical specimens maintained in the Copan Venturi Transystem and Becton Dickinson Port-a-Cul transport systems. Citron DM; Warren YA; Hudspeth MK; Goldstein EJ J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):892-4. PubMed ID: 10655410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of three swab transport systems for the maintenance of clinically important bacteria in simulated mono- and polymicrobial samples. Tano E; Melhus A APMIS; 2011 Mar; 119(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 21284737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the eSwab collection and transportation system to an amies gel transystem for Gram stain of clinical specimens. Fontana C; Favaro M; Limongi D; Pivonkova J; Favalli C BMC Res Notes; 2009 Dec; 2():244. PubMed ID: 20003247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Easy-Flow Copan Liquid Stuart's and Starplex Swab transport systems for recovery of fastidious aerobic bacteria. Drake C; Barenfanger J; Lawhorn J; Verhulst S J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Mar; 43(3):1301-3. PubMed ID: 15750099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]