These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20205206)

  • 21. In-situ biofilm characterization in membrane systems using Optical Coherence Tomography: formation, structure, detachment and impact of flux change.
    Dreszer C; Wexler AD; Drusová S; Overdijk T; Zwijnenburg A; Flemming HC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():243-54. PubMed ID: 25282092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
    Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Systematic analysis of micromixers to minimize biofouling on reverse osmosis membranes.
    Altman SJ; McGrath LK; Jones HD; Sanchez A; Noek R; Clem P; Cook A; Ho CK
    Water Res; 2010 Jun; 44(12):3545-54. PubMed ID: 20493509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Gravity-driven membrane filtration as pretreatment for seawater reverse osmosis: linking biofouling layer morphology with flux stabilization.
    Akhondi E; Wu B; Sun S; Marxer B; Lim W; Gu J; Liu L; Burkhardt M; McDougald D; Pronk W; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2015 Mar; 70():158-73. PubMed ID: 25528546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Vanillin, a potential agent to prevent biofouling of reverse osmosis membrane.
    Kappachery S; Paul D; Yoon J; Kweon JH
    Biofouling; 2010 Aug; 26(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20661790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of water temperature on biofouling development in reverse osmosis membrane systems.
    Farhat NM; Vrouwenvelder JS; Van Loosdrecht MCM; Bucs SS; Staal M
    Water Res; 2016 Oct; 103():149-159. PubMed ID: 27450353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Development of antifouling reverse osmosis membranes for water treatment: A review.
    Kang GD; Cao YM
    Water Res; 2012 Mar; 46(3):584-600. PubMed ID: 22154112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rapid novel test for the determination of biofouling potential on reverse osmosis membranes.
    Manalo CV; Ohno M; Okuda T; Nakai S; Nishijima W
    Water Sci Technol; 2016; 73(12):2978-85. PubMed ID: 27332844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Application of nanosilver surface modification to RO membrane and spacer for mitigating biofouling in seawater desalination.
    Yang HL; Lin JC; Huang C
    Water Res; 2009 Aug; 43(15):3777-86. PubMed ID: 19586651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bacterial growth through microfiltration membranes and NOM characteristics in an MF-RO integrated membrane system: Lab-scale and full-scale studies.
    Park JW; Lee YJ; Meyer AS; Douterelo I; Maeng SK
    Water Res; 2018 Nov; 144():36-45. PubMed ID: 30014977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Non-destructive approaches for assessing biofouling of household reverse osmosis membranes.
    Markwardt SD; Ronnie N; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2018 Aug; 34(7):740-752. PubMed ID: 30270657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Long-term effect on membrane fouling in a new membrane bioreactor as a pretreatment to seawater desalination.
    Jeong S; Rice SA; Vigneswaran S
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Aug; 165():60-8. PubMed ID: 24745896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contribution of assimilable organic carbon to biological fouling in seawater reverse osmosis membrane treatment.
    Weinrich L; LeChevallier M; Haas CN
    Water Res; 2016 Sep; 101():203-213. PubMed ID: 27262548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Control of biofouling by xanthine oxidase on seawater reverse osmosis membranes from a desalination plant: enzyme production and screening of bacterial isolates from the full-scale plant.
    Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Xie Z; Ho G
    Lett Appl Microbiol; 2017 Jul; 65(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 28418590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane.
    Valladares Linares R; Yangali-Quintanilla V; Li Z; Amy G
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6737-44. PubMed ID: 22055122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fouling characteristics of NF and RO operated for removal of dissolved matter from groundwater.
    Gwon EM; Yu MJ; Oh HK; Ylee YH
    Water Res; 2003 Jul; 37(12):2989-97. PubMed ID: 12767302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Biofouling in forward osmosis systems: An experimental and numerical study.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; Vrouwenvelder JS; Picioreanu C
    Water Res; 2016 Dec; 106():86-97. PubMed ID: 27697688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of fouling resistant nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes for dyeing wastewater effluent treatment.
    Myung SW; Choi IH; Lee SH; Kim IC; Lee KH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):159-64. PubMed ID: 16003974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reverse osmosis desalination: water sources, technology, and today's challenges.
    Greenlee LF; Lawler DF; Freeman BD; Marrot B; Moulin P
    Water Res; 2009 May; 43(9):2317-48. PubMed ID: 19371922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Toward improved boron removal in RO by membrane modification: feasibility and challenges.
    Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Apr; 45(8):3613-20. PubMed ID: 21417224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.