These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20205216)

  • 1. Letter 1: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 4-11).
    Sgourakis G; Dedemadi G
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):620; author reply 621-2. PubMed ID: 20205216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Letter 2: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 4-11).
    Kumar S
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):621; author 621-2. PubMed ID: 20205215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Letter 3: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia (Br J Surg 2010; 97: 4-11).
    Kurzer M; Hussain ST
    Br J Surg; 2010 Apr; 97(4):621; author reply 621-2. PubMed ID: 20205214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic with open mesh repair of recurrent inguinal hernia.
    Karthikesalingam A; Markar SR; Holt PJ; Praseedom RK
    Br J Surg; 2010 Jan; 97(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 20013926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2003; 90: 1479-1492).
    Kehlet H; Kingsnorth A
    Br J Surg; 2004 Apr; 91(4):509. PubMed ID: 15048759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2004; 91: 253.
    Das D
    Br J Surg; 2004 May; 91(5):647. PubMed ID: 15122626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomized clinical trial comparing 5-year recurrence rate after laparoscopic versus Shouldice repair of primary inguinal hernia (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 1085-1091).
    Mahmud S
    Br J Surg; 2006 Jan; 93(1):122-3. PubMed ID: 16370023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 33-38).
    Armstrong T
    Br J Surg; 2005 Apr; 92(4):493. PubMed ID: 15786526
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for recurrent inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis of outcomes.
    Dedemadi G; Sgourakis G; Radtke A; Dounavis A; Gockel I; Fouzas I; Karaliotas C; Anagnostou E
    Am J Surg; 2010 Aug; 200(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 20678621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized trial comparing the Prolene Hernia System, mesh plug repair and Lichtenstein method for open inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 33-38).
    Brisinda G
    Br J Surg; 2005 Apr; 92(4):493-4. PubMed ID: 15782390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 506-510).
    Fujita T
    Br J Surg; 2007 Jun; 94(6):757; author reply 757-8. PubMed ID: 17514665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Letter 3: Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 166-170).
    Shoab SS
    Br J Surg; 2005 May; 92(5):655-6; author reply 655. PubMed ID: 15852415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Letter 1: Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 166-170).
    Amalesh T; Cooper D; Singh A
    Br J Surg; 2005 May; 92(5):655; author reply 655. PubMed ID: 15852414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vypro II mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a meta analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Gao M; Han J; Tian J; Yang K
    Ann Surg; 2010 May; 251(5):838-42. PubMed ID: 20395861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter 2: Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2005; 92: 166-170).
    Alfieri S; Di Miceli D; Doglietto GB
    Br J Surg; 2005 May; 92(5):655; author reply 655. PubMed ID: 15852416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Where does laparoscopy fit in the treatment of inguinal hernia in 2003?].
    Gainant A
    J Chir (Paris); 2003 Jun; 140(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 12910217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Re: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing open and laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair with mesh.
    Fujita T
    Br J Surg; 2009 Nov; 96(11):1371-2; author reply 1372. PubMed ID: 19847857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized clinical trial of Lichtenstein's operation versus mesh plug for inguinal hernia repair (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 36-41).
    Frost BM; Riddell AD; Ashworth E; Stephenson BM
    Br J Surg; 2007 Apr; 94(4):515; author reply 515. PubMed ID: 17380556
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved outcomes with the Prolene Hernia System mesh compared with the time-honored Lichtenstein onlay mesh repair for inguinal hernia repair.
    Awad SS; Yallampalli S; Srour AM; Bellows CF; Albo D; Berger DH
    Am J Surg; 2007 Jun; 193(6):697-701. PubMed ID: 17512279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh (Br J Surg 2008; 95: 1226-1231).
    Lee LH
    Br J Surg; 2009 Feb; 96(2):221; author reply 221. PubMed ID: 19160358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.