191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20205349)
1. Long-pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for the treatment of facial telangiectasias: a randomized controlled trial.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2010 Feb; 24(2):143-6. PubMed ID: 20205349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-pulsed dye laser versus intense pulsed light for photodamaged skin: a randomized split-face trial with blinded response evaluation.
Jørgensen GF; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2008 Jul; 40(5):293-9. PubMed ID: 18563775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intense pulsed light vs. long-pulsed dye laser treatment of telangiectasia after radiotherapy for breast cancer: a randomized split-lesion trial of two different treatments.
Nymann P; Hedelund L; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Jun; 160(6):1237-41. PubMed ID: 19309367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Topical brimonidine reduces IPL-induced erythema without affecting efficacy: A randomized controlled trial in patients with facial telangiectasias.
Vissing AE; Dierickx C; Karmisholt KE; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2018 Dec; 50(10):1002-1009. PubMed ID: 29911352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison study of intense pulsed light versus a long-pulse pulsed dye laser in the treatment of facial skin rejuvenation.
Kono T; Groff WF; Sakurai H; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Ann Plast Surg; 2007 Nov; 59(5):479-83. PubMed ID: 17992138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sequential delivery of intense pulsed light and long-pulse 1.064-nm neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser shows better effect in the treatment of facial telangiectasias than using them separately.
Liu J; Zhou BR; Wu D; Xu Y; Luo D
G Ital Dermatol Venereol; 2017 Feb; 152(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 27096538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intense pulsed light to 595-nm long-pulsed pulsed dye laser for treatment of hypertrophic surgical scars: a pilot study.
Bellew SG; Weiss MA; Weiss RA
J Drugs Dermatol; 2005; 4(4):448-52. PubMed ID: 16004017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-pulsed dye laser versus long-pulsed dye laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for acne vulgaris: A randomized controlled trial.
Haedersdal M; Togsverd-Bo K; Wiegell SR; Wulf HC
J Am Acad Dermatol; 2008 Mar; 58(3):387-94. PubMed ID: 18280335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pulsed dye laser vs. intense pulsed light for port-wine stains: a randomized side-by-side trial with blinded response evaluation.
Faurschou A; Togsverd-Bo K; Zachariae C; Haedersdal M
Br J Dermatol; 2009 Feb; 160(2):359-64. PubMed ID: 19120324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Split-face randomized treatment of facial telangiectasia comparing pulsed dye laser and an intense pulsed light handpiece.
Tanghetti EA
Lasers Surg Med; 2012 Feb; 44(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 22180317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rhodamine intense pulsed light versus conventional intense pulsed light for facial telangiectasias.
Piccolo D; Crisman G; Kostaki D; Cannarozzo G; Sannino M; Chimenti S
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2016; 18(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 26736070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Efficacy and Safety of Intense Pulsed Light and Nonablative Fractional 1440-nm Diode Laser to a Combination of the 2 Modalities for Facial Rejuvenation.
Almukhtar RM; Wood ES; Fabi SG
Dermatol Surg; 2023 Jan; 49(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 36533795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intense pulsed light source for treatment of facial telangiectasias.
Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A
J Cosmet Laser Ther; 2001 Dec; 3(4):169-73. PubMed ID: 12554324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laser therapy of spider leg veins: clinical evaluation of a new long pulsed alexandrite laser.
McDaniel DH; Ash K; Lord J; Newman J; Adrian RM; Zukowski M
Dermatol Surg; 1999 Jan; 25(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 9935096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison study of a traditional pulsed dye laser versus a long-pulsed dye laser in the treatment of early childhood hemangiomas.
Kono T; Sakurai H; Groff WF; Chan HH; Takeuchi M; Yamaki T; Soejima K; Nozaki M
Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Feb; 38(2):112-5. PubMed ID: 16374781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Photoepilation with a diode laser vs. intense pulsed light: a randomized, intrapatient left-to-right trial.
Klein A; Steinert S; Baeumler W; Landthaler M; Babilas P
Br J Dermatol; 2013 Jun; 168(6):1287-93. PubMed ID: 23278132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paring and intense pulsed light versus paring alone for recalcitrant hand and foot warts: a randomized clinical trial with blinded outcome evaluation.
Togsverd-Bo K; Gluud C; Winkel P; Larsen HK; Lomholt HB; Cramers M; Bjerring P; Haedersdal M
Lasers Surg Med; 2010 Feb; 42(2):179-84. PubMed ID: 20166158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A Retrospective Study on Efficacy of Pulsed Dye Laser and Intense Pulsed Light for the Treatment of Facial Telangiectasia.
Gao L; Gao N; Song W; Dang E; Yin R; Wang L; Wang G
J Drugs Dermatol; 2017 Nov; 16(11):1112-1116. PubMed ID: 29141059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the long-pulse dye (590-595 nm) and KTP (532 nm) lasers in the treatment of facial and leg telangiectasias.
West TB; Alster TS
Dermatol Surg; 1998 Feb; 24(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 9491116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facial photo rejuvenation using two different intense pulsed light (IPL) wavelength bands.
Bjerring P; Christiansen K; Troilius A; Dierickx C
Lasers Surg Med; 2004; 34(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 15004823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
