These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20206915)
1. Investigating reduced bag weight as an effective risk mediator for mason tenders. Davis KG; Kotowski SE; Albers J; Marras WS Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):822-31. PubMed ID: 20206915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience. Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Load spatial pathway and spine loading: how does lift origin and destination influence low back response? Davis K; Marras W Ergonomics; 2005 Jun; 48(8):1031-46. PubMed ID: 16147419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reduction of spinal loading through the use of handles. Davis KG; Marras WS; Waters TR Ergonomics; 1998 Aug; 41(8):1155-68. PubMed ID: 9715674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands. Marras WS; Davis KG Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality. Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures. Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relation between spinal load factors and the high-risk probability of occupational low-back disorder. Granata KP; Marras WS Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1187-99. PubMed ID: 10503053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of release height on center of pressure and trunk muscle response following sudden release of stoop lifting tasks. Chow DH; Cheng AC; Holmes AD; Evans JH Appl Ergon; 2003 Nov; 34(6):611-9. PubMed ID: 14559422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles. Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions. Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting. Marras WS; Granata KP; Davis KG; Allread WG; Jorgensen MJ Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):980-96. PubMed ID: 10424186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]