These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20206915)

  • 21. Reduction of spinal loads through adjustable interventions at the origin and destination of palletizing tasks.
    Ramsey T; Davis KG; Kotowski SE; Anderson VP; Waters T
    Hum Factors; 2014 Nov; 56(7):1222-34. PubMed ID: 25490803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Workplace design guidelines for asymptomatic vs. low-back-injured workers.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr D
    Appl Ergon; 2005 Jan; 36(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 15627426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Working height, block mass and one- vs. two-handed block handling: the contribution to low back and shoulder loading during masonry work.
    Faber GS; Kingma I; Kuijer PP; van der Molen HF; Hoozemans MJ; Frings-Dresen MH; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2009 Sep; 52(9):1104-18. PubMed ID: 19787512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Repositioning a slumped person in a wheelchair. A biomechanical analysis of three transfer techniques.
    Varcin-Coad L; Barrett R
    AAOHN J; 1998 Nov; 46(11):530-6. PubMed ID: 9934001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Loading along the lumbar spine as influence by speed, control, load magnitude, and handle height during pushing.
    Marras WS; Knapik GG; Ferguson S
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 19111950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of cumulative low back loads of caregivers when transferring patients using overhead and floor mechanical lifting devices.
    Santaguida PL; Pierrynowski M; Goldsmith C; Fernie G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Nov; 20(9):906-16. PubMed ID: 16054280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Gender influences on spine loads during complex lifting.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Jorgensen M
    Spine J; 2003; 3(2):93-9. PubMed ID: 14589221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of block weight on work demands and physical workload during masonry work.
    Van Der Molen HF; Kuijer PP; Hopmans PP; Houweling AG; Faber GS; Hoozemans MJ; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Mar; 51(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 17896225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An evaluation of predictive methods for estimating cumulative spinal loading.
    Callaghan JP; Salewytsch AJ; Andrews DM
    Ergonomics; 2001 Jul; 44(9):825-37. PubMed ID: 11560364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Continuous assessment of low back loads in long-term care nurses.
    Holmes MW; Hodder JN; Keir PJ
    Ergonomics; 2010 Sep; 53(9):1108-16. PubMed ID: 20737336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differences in motor recruitment and resulting kinematics between low back pain patients and asymptomatic participants during lifting exertions.
    Ferguson SA; Marras WS; Burr DL; Davis KG; Gupta P
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Dec; 19(10):992-9. PubMed ID: 15531048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The loads on the lumbar spine during work at an assembly line. The risks for fatigue injuries of vertebral bodies.
    Magnusson M; Granqvist M; Jonson R; Lindell V; Lundberg U; Wallin L; Hansson T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1990 Aug; 15(8):774-9. PubMed ID: 2237627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A biomechanical analysis of loads on x-ray technologists: a field study.
    Kumar S; Moro L; Narayan Y
    Ergonomics; 2003 Apr; 46(5):502-17. PubMed ID: 12745699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Efficacy of adjusting working height and mechanizing of transport on physical work demands and local discomfort in construction work.
    van der Molen HF; Grouwstra R; Kuijer PP; Sluiter JK; Frings-Dresen MH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Jun; 47(7):772-83. PubMed ID: 15204287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inter- and intra-observer reliability of calculating cumulative lumbar spine loads.
    Sullivan D; Bryden P; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2002 Sep; 45(11):788-97. PubMed ID: 12487691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Acceptable workloads for three common mining materials.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA
    Ergonomics; 1992 Sep; 35(9):1013-31. PubMed ID: 1387078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers.
    Ljungberg AS; Kilbom A; Hägg GM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 2924762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Anticipatory control of vertical lifting force and momentum during the squat lift with expected and unexpected loads.
    Heiss DG; Shields RK; Yack HJ
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2001 Dec; 31(12):708-23; discussion 724-9. PubMed ID: 11767247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.