BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

376 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20206970)

  • 1. Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi.
    Ray AA; Ghiculete D; Pace KT; Honey RJ
    Urology; 2010 Aug; 76(2):295-300. PubMed ID: 20206970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of ultrasonography for renal stone detection and size determination: is it good enough for management decisions?
    Ganesan V; De S; Greene D; Torricelli FC; Monga M
    BJU Int; 2017 Mar; 119(3):464-469. PubMed ID: 27459091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective comparison of measured stone size and posterior acoustic shadow width in clinical ultrasound images.
    Dai JC; Dunmire B; Sternberg KM; Liu Z; Larson T; Thiel J; Chang HC; Harper JD; Bailey MR; Sorensen MD
    World J Urol; 2018 May; 36(5):727-732. PubMed ID: 29243111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The efficacy of ultrasonography for the detection of renal stone.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Sakamoto H; Nishiyama R; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2014 Aug; 84(2):285-8. PubMed ID: 24908592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size.
    Narepalem N; Sundaram CP; Boridy IC; Yan Y; Heiken JP; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2002 Mar; 167(3):1235-8. PubMed ID: 11832704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography.
    Jackman SV; Potter SR; Regan F; Jarrett TW
    J Urol; 2000 Aug; 164(2):308-10. PubMed ID: 10893571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasound accuracy in evaluating renal calculi in Maysan province.
    Abbas SK; Al-Omary TSS; Fawzi HA
    J Med Life; 2024 Feb; 17(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 38813369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coronal imaging to assess urinary tract stone size.
    Nadler RB; Stern JA; Kimm S; Hoff F; Rademaker AW
    J Urol; 2004 Sep; 172(3):962-4. PubMed ID: 15311009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonography Significantly Overestimates Stone Size When Compared to Low-dose, Noncontrast Computed Tomography.
    Sternberg KM; Eisner B; Larson T; Hernandez N; Han J; Pais VM
    Urology; 2016 Sep; 95():67-71. PubMed ID: 27289025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Automated volumetric assessment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nephrolithiasis.
    Patel SR; Wells S; Ruma J; King S; Lubner MG; Nakada SY; Pickhardt PJ
    Urology; 2012 Jul; 80(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 22578829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Utility of the Kidneys-ureters-bladder Radiograph as the Sole Imaging Modality and Its Combination With Ultrasonography for the Detection of Renal Stones.
    Kanno T; Kubota M; Funada S; Okada T; Higashi Y; Yamada H
    Urology; 2017 Jun; 104():40-44. PubMed ID: 28341578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In young adults with a low body mass index ultrasonography is sufficient as a diagnostic tool for ureteric stones.
    Pichler R; Skradski V; Aigner F; Leonhartsberger N; Steiner H
    BJU Int; 2012 Mar; 109(5):770-4. PubMed ID: 21740502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of kidney stones in the pediatric population: a clinical effectiveness study.
    Roberson NP; Dillman JR; O'Hara SM; DeFoor WR; Reddy PP; Giordano RM; Trout AT
    Pediatr Radiol; 2018 Jul; 48(7):962-972. PubMed ID: 29476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard.
    Fowler KA; Locken JA; Duchesne JH; Williamson MR
    Radiology; 2002 Jan; 222(1):109-13. PubMed ID: 11756713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of Clinically Insignificant Renal Calculi on Sonography.
    Taylor DZ; Smith GE; Wiener SV
    Urology; 2023 Jun; 176():55-62. PubMed ID: 37001825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison.
    Sheafor DH; Hertzberg BS; Freed KS; Carroll BA; Keogan MT; Paulson EK; DeLong DM; Nelson RC
    Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):792-7. PubMed ID: 11110945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do the variations in renal pelvic angles play a role in the formation of renal stone? A computed tomography study.
    Sanal B; Korkmaz M; Can F; Aras B; Buyukkaya A
    Ren Fail; 2015; 37(9):1448-51. PubMed ID: 26338289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of B-mode ultrasonography in the detection of urolithiasis in patients with acute renal colic.
    Haroun AA; Hadidy AM; Mithqal AM; Mahafza WS; Al-Riyalat NT; Sheikh-Ali RF
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2010 May; 21(3):488-93. PubMed ID: 20427874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT.
    Ulusan S; Koc Z; Tokmak N
    J Clin Ultrasound; 2007 Jun; 35(5):256-61. PubMed ID: 17373690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of urinary tract calculi with 64-MDCT: The axial versus coronal plane.
    Metser U; Ghai S; Ong YY; Lockwood G; Radomski SB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1509-13. PubMed ID: 19457812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.