487 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207063)
1. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecologic disease.
Rosero EB; Kho KA; Joshi GP; Giesecke M; Schaffer JI
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):778-786. PubMed ID: 24084534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in the patient with a scarred or obliterated anterior cul-de-sac.
Advincula AP; Reynolds RK
JSLS; 2005; 9(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 16121873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Initial experience with single-port robotic hysterectomy.
Gomes MTV; Machado AMN; Podgaec S; Barison GAS
Einstein (Sao Paulo); 2017; 15(4):476-480. PubMed ID: 29364368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus da Vinci robotic hysterectomy: is using the robot beneficial?
Soto E; Lo Y; Friedman K; Soto C; Nezhat F; Chuang L; Gretz H
J Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 22(4):253-9. PubMed ID: 22247802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program.
Steinberg PL; Merguerian PA; Bihrle W; Heaney JA; Seigne JD
JSLS; 2008; 12(1):9-12. PubMed ID: 18402732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial Experience in Urological Surgery with a Novel Robotic Technology: Magnetic-Assisted Robotic Surgery in Urology.
Larenas F; Flores I; Roman C; Martinez C; Gatica T; Sánchez C; Ortiz JF
J Endourol; 2024 Mar; 38(3):212-218. PubMed ID: 38185914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Robot-assisted pelvic and renal surgery compared with laparoscopic or open surgery: Literature review of cost-effectiveness and clinical outcomes.
Davidson T; Sjödahl R; Aldman Å; Lennmarken C; Kammerlind AS; Theodorsson E
Scand J Surg; 2024 Mar; 113(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 37555486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abdominal Colpopexy: Comparison of Endoscopic Surgical Strategies (ACCESS).
Mueller ER; Kenton K; Tarnay C; Brubaker L; Rosenman A; Smith B; Stroupe K; Bresee C; Pantuck A; Schulam P; Anger JT
Contemp Clin Trials; 2012 Sep; 33(5):1011-8. PubMed ID: 22643040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynaecology: An Evolving Assistive Technology.
Xie S; Wood TC; Dasgupta P; Aydin A
Surg Innov; 2024 Jun; 31(3):324-330. PubMed ID: 38446503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review.
Alshowaikh K; Karpinska-Leydier K; Amirthalingam J; Paidi G; Iroshani Jayarathna AI; Salibindla DBAMR; Ergin HE
Cureus; 2021 Aug; 13(8):e16828. PubMed ID: 34367836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic and Robotically Assisted Hysterectomy for Benign Pathology during Introduction of a Robotic Program.
Kilic GS; Moore G; Elbatanony A; Radecki C; Phelps JY; Borahay MA
Obstet Gynecol Int; 2011; 2011():683703. PubMed ID: 22007229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perioperative surgical outcome of conventional and robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
van Weelden WJ; Gordon BBM; Roovers EA; Kraayenbrink AA; Aalders CIM; Hartog F; Dijkhuizen FPHLJ
Gynecol Surg; 2017; 14(1):5. PubMed ID: 28603473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic staging of gynecologic malignancies.
Reynolds RK; Burke WM; Advincula AP
JSLS; 2005; 9(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 15984701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost drivers for benign hysterectomy within a health care system: Influence of patient, perioperative, and hospital factors.
Kohn JR; Frost AS; Tambovtseva A; Hunt M; Clark K; Wilson C; Borahay MA
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 May; 161(2):616-623. PubMed ID: 36436911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of Uterine Weight on the Surgical Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Hysterectomy in Benign Indications.
Higuchi N; Kanno K; Ochi Y; Sawada M; Sakate S; Yanai S; Andou M
Cureus; 2024 Mar; 16(3):e56602. PubMed ID: 38646385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Preclinical evaluation of the versius surgical system, a new robot-assisted surgical device for use in minimal access general and colorectal procedures.
Morton J; Hardwick RH; Tilney HS; Gudgeon AM; Jah A; Stevens L; Marecik S; Slack M
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2169-2177. PubMed ID: 32405893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Novel Robotic Platforms for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Narrative Review.
Kallidonis P; Gkeka K; Tatanis V; Katsakiori P; Vrettos T; Liatsikos E
J Endourol; 2024 May; ():. PubMed ID: 38753723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Changes in route of hysterectomy in Norway since introduction of robotic approach.
Johanson ML; Lieng M
Facts Views Vis Obgyn; 2021 Mar; 13(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33889859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective Implementation and Evaluation of a Decision-Tree Algorithm for Route of Hysterectomy.
Schmitt JJ; Baker MV; Occhino JA; McGree ME; Weaver AL; Bakkum-Gamez JN; Dowdy SC; Pasupathy KS; Gebhart JB
Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Apr; 135(4):761-769. PubMed ID: 32168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
