BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

325 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207478)

  • 1. Long-term operation of submerged membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the treatment of synthetic wastewater containing styrene as volatile organic compound (VOC): Effect of hydraulic retention time (HRT).
    Fallah N; Bonakdarpour B; Nasernejad B; Alavi Moghadam MR
    J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):718-24. PubMed ID: 20207478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling.
    Huang Z; Ong SL; Ng HY
    Water Res; 2011 Jan; 45(2):705-13. PubMed ID: 20851448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
    Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A submerged tubular ceramic membrane bioreactor for high strength wastewater treatment.
    Sun DD; Zeng JL; Tay JH
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 47(1):105-11. PubMed ID: 12578181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sustainable membrane operation design for the treatment of the synthetic coke wastewater in SMBR.
    Zhou Y; Xu ZL; Munib S; Chen GE; Lu Q
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(8):2115-24. PubMed ID: 19844058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the removal of phthalates and other organic pollutants from industrial wastewaters in membrane bioreactor and conventional activated sludge treatment plants.
    Llop A; Borrull F; Pocurull E
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 60(9):2425-37. PubMed ID: 19901476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Control of membrane fouling in membrane bioreactor process by coagulant addition.
    Mishima I; Nakajima J
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(7):1255-62. PubMed ID: 19380989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A pilot study on accelerated sludge degradation by a high-concentration membrane bioreactor coupled with sludge pretreatment.
    Yeom IT; Lee KR; Choi YG; Kim HS; Kwon JH; Lee UJ; Lee YH
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):201-10. PubMed ID: 16459793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effluent quality of a conventional activated sludge and a membrane bioreactor system treating hospital wastewater.
    Pauwels B; Fru Ngwa F; Deconinck S; Verstraete W
    Environ Technol; 2006 Apr; 27(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 16583824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: Behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential.
    Liang S; Liu C; Song L
    Water Res; 2007 Jan; 41(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 17109912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Meng F; Shi B; Yang F; Zhang H
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Sep; 30(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 17566785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of membrane fouling under constant and variable organic loadings in submerge membrane bioreactors.
    Zhang J; Zhou J; Liu Y; Fane AG
    Water Res; 2010 Oct; 44(18):5407-13. PubMed ID: 20684971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.
    Kimura K; Naruse T; Watanabe Y
    Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19059627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New process for alleviation of membrane fouling of modified hybrid MBR system for advanced domestic wastewater treatment.
    Shuo L; Baozhen W; Hongjun H; Yanping L
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):2059-66. PubMed ID: 19039188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Change in the fouling propensity of sludge in membrane bioreactors (MBR) in relation to the accumulation of biopolymer clusters.
    Sun FY; Wang XM; Li XY
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4718-25. PubMed ID: 21316942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of organic loading rate on a wastewater treatment process combining moving bed biofilm and membrane reactors.
    Melin E; Leiknes T; Helness H; Rasmussen V; Odegaard H
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(6-7):421-30. PubMed ID: 16004004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High salinity wastewater treatment using yeast and bacterial membrane bioreactors.
    Dan NP; Visvanathan C; Polprasert C; Ben Aim R
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 46(9):201-9. PubMed ID: 12448470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The removal of residual organic matter from biologically treated swine wastewater using membrane bioreactor process with powdered activated carbon.
    Whang GD; Cho YM; Park H; Jang JG
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(5-6):451-7. PubMed ID: 15137457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduced membrane fouling in a novel bio-entrapped membrane reactor for treatment of food and beverage processing wastewater.
    Ng KK; Lin CF; Panchangam SC; Andy Hong PK; Yang PY
    Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4269-78. PubMed ID: 21705038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.