These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

73 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207514)

  • 1. Does suggestive information cause a confirmation bias in bullet comparisons?
    Kerstholt J; Eikelboom A; Dijkman T; Stoel R; Hermsen R; van Leuven B
    Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):138-42. PubMed ID: 20207514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
    Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
    Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. "Will a Cuscus bite you, if he shows his teeth?" Inducing a fear-related confirmation bias in children by providing verbal threat information to their mothers.
    Remmerswaal D; Muris P; Mayer B; Smeets G
    J Anxiety Disord; 2010 Jun; 24(5):540-6. PubMed ID: 20409677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
    Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
    J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective.
    Kerr NL; Niedermeier KE; Kaplan MF
    Organ Behav Hum Decis Process; 1999 Oct; 80(1):70-86. PubMed ID: 10508569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Just Another Statistic".
    Machtay M; Glatstein E
    Oncologist; 1998; 3(3):III-IV. PubMed ID: 10388105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of examiner differences on KIG-classification when assessing malocclusions.
    Gesch D; Kirbschus A; Schröder W; Bernhardt O; Proff P; Bayerlein T; Gedrange T; Kocher T
    J Orofac Orthop; 2006 Mar; 67(2):81-91. PubMed ID: 16570130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Testing for potential contextual bias effects during the verification stage of the ACE-V methodology when conducting fingerprint comparisons.
    Langenburg G; Champod C; Wertheim P
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):571-82. PubMed ID: 19432737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biased information search in homogeneous groups: confidence as a moderator for the effect of anticipated task requirements.
    Kerschreiter R; Schulz-Hardt S; Mojzisch A; Frey D
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 34(5):679-91. PubMed ID: 18310314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surprise, memory, and retrospective judgment making: testing cognitive reconstruction theories of the hindsight bias effect.
    Ash IK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jul; 35(4):916-33. PubMed ID: 19586261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Validation of the reproducibility of the DMF Index used in bucco-dental epidemiology and evaluation of its 2 clinical forms].
    Roland E; Gueguen G; Longis MJ; Boiselle J
    World Health Stat Q; 1994; 47(2):44-61. PubMed ID: 8073791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of candidate familiarity on examiner OSCE scores.
    Jefferies A; Simmons B; Regehr G
    Med Educ; 2007 Sep; 41(9):888-91. PubMed ID: 17727529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NIST bullet signature measurement system for RM (Reference Material) 8240 standard bullets.
    Ma L; Song J; Whitenton E; Zheng A; Vorburger T; Zhou J
    J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jul; 49(4):649-59. PubMed ID: 15317178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence of gender bias in legal insanity evaluations: a case vignette study of clinicians, judges and students.
    Yourstone J; Lindholm T; Grann M; Svenson O
    Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 18720232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Timing bias in the psychiatry subject examination of the National Board of Medical Examiners.
    Manley M; Heiss G
    Acad Psychiatry; 2006; 30(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 16609116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Shoe print examinations: effects of expectation, complexity and experience.
    Kerstholt JH; Paashuis R; Sjerps M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Jan; 165(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 16533583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Epidemiologic studies: pitfalls in interpretation.
    Westhoff CL
    Dialogues Contracept; 1995; 4(5):5-6, 8. PubMed ID: 12288680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Suicidal single intraoral shooting by a shotgun--risk of misinterpretation at the crime scene].
    Woźniak K; Pohl J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2003; 53(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 14971300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.