BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

332 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207713)

  • 1. An alignment confidence score capturing robustness to guide tree uncertainty.
    Penn O; Privman E; Landan G; Graur D; Pupko T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Aug; 27(8):1759-67. PubMed ID: 20207713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of the guide tree on multiple sequence alignments and subsequent phylogenetic analyses.
    Nelesen S; Liu K; Zhao D; Linder CR; Warnow T
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2008; ():25-36. PubMed ID: 18229674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GUIDANCE2: accurate detection of unreliable alignment regions accounting for the uncertainty of multiple parameters.
    Sela I; Ashkenazy H; Katoh K; Pupko T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Jul; 43(W1):W7-14. PubMed ID: 25883146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. GUIDANCE: a web server for assessing alignment confidence scores.
    Penn O; Privman E; Ashkenazy H; Landan G; Graur D; Pupko T
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2010 Jul; 38(Web Server issue):W23-8. PubMed ID: 20497997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evidence of Statistical Inconsistency of Phylogenetic Methods in the Presence of Multiple Sequence Alignment Uncertainty.
    Md Mukarram Hossain AS; Blackburne BP; Shah A; Whelan S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2015 Jul; 7(8):2102-16. PubMed ID: 26139831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. TCS: a new multiple sequence alignment reliability measure to estimate alignment accuracy and improve phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
    Chang JM; Di Tommaso P; Notredame C
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Jun; 31(6):1625-37. PubMed ID: 24694831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PnpProbs: a better multiple sequence alignment tool by better handling of guide trees.
    Ye Y; Lam TW; Ting HF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):285. PubMed ID: 27585754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multiple Sequence Alignment Averaging Improves Phylogeny Reconstruction.
    Ashkenazy H; Sela I; Levy Karin E; Landan G; Pupko T
    Syst Biol; 2019 Jan; 68(1):117-130. PubMed ID: 29771363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class of multiple sequence alignment algorithm affects genomic analysis.
    Blackburne BP; Whelan S
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Mar; 30(3):642-53. PubMed ID: 23144040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
    Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization of pairwise and multiple sequence alignment errors.
    Landan G; Graur D
    Gene; 2009 Jul; 441(1-2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18614299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized Bootstrap Supports for Phylogenetic Analyses of Protein Sequences Incorporating Alignment Uncertainty.
    Chatzou M; Floden EW; Di Tommaso P; Gascuel O; Notredame C
    Syst Biol; 2018 Nov; 67(6):997-1009. PubMed ID: 30295908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. MergeAlign: improving multiple sequence alignment performance by dynamic reconstruction of consensus multiple sequence alignments.
    Collingridge PW; Kelly S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 May; 13():117. PubMed ID: 22646090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation measures of multiple sequence alignments.
    Gonnet GH; Korostensky C; Benner S
    J Comput Biol; 2000; 7(1-2):261-76. PubMed ID: 10890401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Protein multiple sequence alignment benchmarking through secondary structure prediction.
    Le Q; Sievers F; Higgins DG
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1331-1337. PubMed ID: 28093407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Joint Bayesian estimation of alignment and phylogeny.
    Redelings BD; Suchard MA
    Syst Biol; 2005 Jun; 54(3):401-18. PubMed ID: 16012107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
    Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improving multiple sequence alignment by using better guide trees.
    Zhan Q; Ye Y; Lam TW; Yiu SM; Wang Y; Ting HF
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):S4. PubMed ID: 25859903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterization of multiple sequence alignment errors using complete-likelihood score and position-shift map.
    Ezawa K
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():133. PubMed ID: 26992851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of the MAFFT sequence alignment program to large data-reexamination of the usefulness of chained guide trees.
    Yamada KD; Tomii K; Katoh K
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(21):3246-3251. PubMed ID: 27378296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.