These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207748)

  • 1. Post-processing image filtration enabling dose reduction in standard abdominal CT.
    Leander P; Söderberg M; Fält T; Gunnarsson M; Albertsson I
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):180-5. PubMed ID: 20207748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of iterative reconstruction and automated tube voltage selection on the image quality and radiation dose in abdominal CT scans.
    Desai GS; Fuentes Orrego JM; Kambadakone AR; Sahani DV
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):897-903. PubMed ID: 24270111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of adaptive non-linear 2D and 3D postprocessing filters for reduced dose abdominal CT.
    Borgen L; Kalra MK; Laerum F; Hachette IW; Fredriksson CH; Sandborg M; Smedby O
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):335-42. PubMed ID: 22362136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Simulated dose reduction by adding artificial noise to measured raw data: a validation study.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M; Nilsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):71-7. PubMed ID: 20172933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal multidetector row CT parameters for evaluations of the breast: a phantom and specimen study.
    Yi A; Seo BK; Cho PK; Pisano ED; Lee KY; Je BK; Kim HY; Min BW; Son GS
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Jun; 17(6):744-51. PubMed ID: 20457417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimal use of AEC in CT: a literature review.
    Gudjónsdóttir J; Ween B; Olsen DR
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 81(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 20207787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated computed tomography dose-saving algorithm to protect radiosensitive tissues: estimation of radiation exposure and image quality considerations.
    Ketelsen D; Buchgeister M; Fenchel M; Schmidt B; Flohr TG; Syha R; Thomas C; Tsiflikas I; Claussen CD; Heuschmid M
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):148-52. PubMed ID: 21934513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose.
    Schindera ST; Graca P; Patak MA; Abderhalden S; von Allmen G; Vock P; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Oct; 44(10):650-5. PubMed ID: 19724236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. CT dose: medical residents take note.
    Slothus RJ
    Radiol Technol; 2010; 82(2):112. PubMed ID: 21048061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Radiation dose reduction with Sinogram Affirmed Iterative Reconstruction technique for abdominal computed tomography.
    Kalra MK; Woisetschläger M; Dahlström N; Singh S; Lindblom M; Choy G; Quick P; Schmidt B; Sedlmair M; Blake MA; Persson A
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 22592621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
    Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of 2D, non-linear noise reduction filtering in cardiac imaging: a pilot study.
    De Geer J; Sandborg M; Smedby Ö; Persson A
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):716-22. PubMed ID: 21852437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quantifying the potential for dose reduction with visual grading regression.
    Smedby O; Fredrikson M; De Geer J; Borgen L; Sandborg M
    Br J Radiol; 2013 Jan; 86(1021):20110784. PubMed ID: 23239690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging dose management using multi-resolution in CT-guided radiation therapy.
    Sheng K; Jeraj R; Shaw R; Mackie TR; Paliwal BR
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(6):1205-19. PubMed ID: 15798317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dose performance and image quality: dual source CT versus single source CT in cardiac CT angiography.
    Wang M; Qi HT; Wang XM; Wang T; Chen JH; Liu C
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):396-400. PubMed ID: 18835119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new era in computed tomographic dose optimization: the impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose.
    Kordolaimi SD; Argentos S; Pantos I; Kelekis NL; Efstathopoulos EP
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2013; 37(6):924-31. PubMed ID: 24270114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The benefit of accounting for DQE variations in simulated dose reduction of digital radiographic systems.
    Svalkvist A; Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):57-61. PubMed ID: 20176729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A phantom study showing the importance of compression in conventional diagnostic X-ray examinations.
    Olsson ML; Tingberg A; Mattsson S
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):78-80. PubMed ID: 20207751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.