These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20207962)

  • 1. Monitoring vigilance during perimetry by using pupillography.
    Henson DB; Emuh T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jul; 51(7):3540-3. PubMed ID: 20207962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Threshold and variability properties of matrix frequency-doubling technology and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma.
    Artes PH; Hutchison DM; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2451-7. PubMed ID: 15980235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing pupil function with visual function in patients with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy.
    Bremner FD; Shallo-Hoffmann J; Riordan-Eva P; Smith SE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Oct; 40(11):2528-34. PubMed ID: 10509646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Pupillography for objective vigilance assessment. Methodological problems and possible solutions].
    Wilhelm B; Wilhelm H; Lüdtke H; Adler M; Streicher P
    Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):446-50. PubMed ID: 8963145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High-resolution multifocal pupillographic objective perimetry in glaucoma.
    Carle CF; James AC; Kolic M; Loh YW; Maddess T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2011 Feb; 52(1):604-10. PubMed ID: 20881285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pupil perimetry using M-sequence stimulation technique.
    Wilhelm H; Neitzel J; Wilhelm B; Beuel S; Lüdtke H; Kretschmann U; Zrenner E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Apr; 41(5):1229-38. PubMed ID: 10752964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Testing for glaucoma with frequency-doubling perimetry in normals, ocular hypertensives, and glaucoma patients.
    Horn FK; Wakili N; Jünemann AM; Korth M
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Aug; 240(8):658-65. PubMed ID: 12192460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of intraocular pressure reduction on perimetric variability in glaucomatous eyes.
    Fogagnolo P; McNaught A; Centofanti M; Rossetti L; Orzalesi N
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4557-63. PubMed ID: 17898278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dichoptic multifocal pupillography reveals afferent visual field defects in early type 2 diabetes.
    Bell A; James AC; Kolic M; Essex RW; Maddess T
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2010 Jan; 51(1):602-8. PubMed ID: 19643957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Repeatability of frequency doubling technology perimetry (20-1 screening program) and the effect of pupillary dilatation on interpretation.
    Parikh R; Muliyil J; George R; Bhat S; Thomas R
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2008; 15(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 18300088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Variability in patients with glaucomatous visual field damage is reduced using size V stimuli.
    Wall M; Kutzko KE; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Feb; 38(2):426-35. PubMed ID: 9040476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Tanakadate A; Ishikawa S
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.
    Hong S; Narkiewicz J; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perimetric sensitivity and response variability in glaucoma with single-stimulus automated perimetry and multiple-stimulus perimetry with verbal feedback.
    Miranda MA; Henson DB
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):202-6. PubMed ID: 18005269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results.
    Kudrna GR; Stanley MA; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Test-retest variability of frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional perimetry in glaucoma patients and normal subjects.
    Chauhan BC; Johnson CA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 Mar; 40(3):648-56. PubMed ID: 10067968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking.
    Murray IC; Fleck BW; Brash HM; Macrae ME; Tan LL; Minns RA
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Oct; 116(10):2017-26. PubMed ID: 19560207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of fixation accuracy on threshold variability in patients with open angle glaucoma.
    Henson DB; Evans J; Chauhan BC; Lane C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Feb; 37(2):444-50. PubMed ID: 8603850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Properties of perimetric threshold estimates from Full Threshold, SITA Standard, and SITA Fast strategies.
    Artes PH; Iwase A; Ohno Y; Kitazawa Y; Chauhan BC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Aug; 43(8):2654-9. PubMed ID: 12147599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.