BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20208528)

  • 1. Cortical representations of bodies and faces are strongest in commonly experienced configurations.
    Chan AW; Kravitz DJ; Truong S; Arizpe J; Baker CI
    Nat Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 13(4):417-8. PubMed ID: 20208528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
    Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monocular advantage for face perception implicates subcortical mechanisms in adult humans.
    Gabay S; Nestor A; Dundas E; Behrmann M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 May; 26(5):927-37. PubMed ID: 24236767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Involvement of low-level visual areas in hemispheric superiority for face processing.
    Sung YW; Someya Y; Eriko Y; Choi SH; Cho ZH; Ogawa S
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1390():118-25. PubMed ID: 21443866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intermixed structure of voxels with different hemispheric characteristics in the fusiform face area.
    Choi US; Sung YW; Choi SH; Kim N; Kim YB; Cho ZH; Ogawa S
    Neuroreport; 2013 Jan; 24(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 23222657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
    Liu J; Harris A; Kanwisher N
    Nat Neurosci; 2002 Sep; 5(9):910-6. PubMed ID: 12195430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ERP responses greater for faces in the temporal compared to the nasal visual field.
    Framorando D; Burra N; Bapst M; Pegna AJ
    Neurosci Lett; 2018 Feb; 665():7-12. PubMed ID: 29155351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The perirhinal cortex modulates V2 activity in response to the agreement between part familiarity and configuration familiarity.
    Peterson MA; Cacciamani L; Barense MD; Scalf PE
    Hippocampus; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1965-77. PubMed ID: 22987675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Triple dissociation of faces, bodies, and objects in extrastriate cortex.
    Pitcher D; Charles L; Devlin JT; Walsh V; Duchaine B
    Curr Biol; 2009 Feb; 19(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 19200723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Symmetrical Viewpoint Representations in Face-Selective Regions Convey an Advantage in the Perception and Recognition of Faces.
    Flack TR; Harris RJ; Young AW; Andrews TJ
    J Neurosci; 2019 May; 39(19):3741-3751. PubMed ID: 30842248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Top-down activation of shape-specific population codes in visual cortex during mental imagery.
    Stokes M; Thompson R; Cusack R; Duncan J
    J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(5):1565-72. PubMed ID: 19193903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: evidence from the N170 ERP component.
    Caharel S; d'Arripe O; Ramon M; Jacques C; Rossion B
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Feb; 47(3):639-43. PubMed ID: 19084547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The optimal viewing position in face recognition.
    Hsiao JH; Liu TT
    J Vis; 2012 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 22375068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-face recognition is characterized by "bilateral gain" and by faster, more accurate performance which persists when faces are inverted.
    Keyes H; Brady N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 May; 63(5):840-7. PubMed ID: 20198537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neural basis of identity information extraction from noisy face images.
    Hermann P; Bankó ÉM; Gál V; Vidnyánszky Z
    J Neurosci; 2015 May; 35(18):7165-73. PubMed ID: 25948266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neuronal correlates of perception in early visual cortex.
    Ress D; Heeger DJ
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 12627164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Holistic crowding of Mooney faces.
    Farzin F; Rivera SM; Whitney D
    J Vis; 2009 Jun; 9(6):18.1-15. PubMed ID: 19761309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Direct evidence for attention-dependent influences of the frontal eye-fields on feature-responsive visual cortex.
    Heinen K; Feredoes E; Weiskopf N; Ruff CC; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Nov; 24(11):2815-21. PubMed ID: 23794715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception and Processing of Faces in the Human Brain Is Tuned to Typical Feature Locations.
    de Haas B; Schwarzkopf DS; Alvarez I; Lawson RP; Henriksson L; Kriegeskorte N; Rees G
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(36):9289-302. PubMed ID: 27605606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spatiotemporal dynamics and connectivity pattern differences between centrally and peripherally presented faces.
    Liu L; Ioannides AA
    Neuroimage; 2006 Jul; 31(4):1726-40. PubMed ID: 16564185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.