These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209173)
1. The effect of mandibular tongue cribs on dentoskeletal changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions. Meibodi SE; Meybodi SA; Meybodi EM World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 20209173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study. Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion. Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions. Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cephalometric study to test the reliability of anteroposterior skeletal discrepancy indicators using the twin block appliance. Trivedi R; Bhattacharya A; Mehta F; Patel D; Parekh H; Gandhi V Prog Orthod; 2015 Feb; 16():3. PubMed ID: 25769138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Early vs late orthodontic treatment of deepbite: a prospective clinical trial in growing subjects. Baccetti T; Franchi L; Giuntini V; Masucci C; Vangelisti A; Defraia E Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 22748993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion. Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Early functional treatment in Class II division 1 subjects with mandibular retrognathia using Fränkel II appliance. A prospective controlled study. Silvestrini-Biavati A; Alberti G; Silvestrini Biavati F; Signori A; Castaldo A; Migliorati M Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2012 Dec; 13(4):301-6. PubMed ID: 23270288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Pilot Study on the Dentoalveolar and Skeletal Effects of Two Functional Appliances in Class II, Division 1 Growing Children. Chen H; Yagi K; Almeida FR; Pliska BT; Lowe AA Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(2):15-20. PubMed ID: 26349284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictive value of molar bite force on Class II functional appliance treatment outcomes. Antonarakis GS; Kjellberg H; Kiliaridis S Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 21411476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients. Heinrichs DA; Shammaa I; Martin C; Razmus T; Gunel E; Ngan P Prog Orthod; 2014; 15(1):45. PubMed ID: 25138988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment effects of R-appliance and Fränkel-2 in Class II division 1 malocclusions. Showkatbakhsh R; Castaldo MI; Jamilian A; Padricelli G; Fahimi Hanzayi M; Cappabianca S; Perillo L Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Mar; 14(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 23597214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial. Burhan AS; Nawaya FR Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment. Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The short-term effects of face mask and fixed tongue appliance on maxillary deficiency in growing patients--a randomized clinical trial. Showkatbakhsh R; Jamilian A; Behnaz M; Ghassemi M; Ghassemi A Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2015; 26(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25881382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion. Das UM; Reddy D J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The mandibular response in Class II malocclusions correction. Cordua T; Deli R; Giuliante L; Ursini R Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(3):31-9. PubMed ID: 22031992 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mechanisms of Class II correction induced by the crown Herbst appliance as a single-phase Class II therapy: 1 year follow-up. Jakobsone G; Latkauskiene D; McNamara JA Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():27. PubMed ID: 24326090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of maxillary protraction and its long-term stability--a clinical trial in Chinese adolescents. Chen L; Chen R; Yang Y; Ji G; Shen G Eur J Orthod; 2012 Feb; 34(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21325335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study. Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]