These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209181)

  • 1. Crown angulation and inclination of Northern Thais with good occlusion.
    Jotikasthira D; Sheffield P; Kalha A; Syed Z
    World J Orthod; 2010; 11(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 20209181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mesio-distal tooth angulation in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
    Fuma A; Motegi E; Fukagawa H; Nomura M; Kano M; Sueishi K; Okano S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):57-64. PubMed ID: 20689235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tooth inclination in elderly with many remaining teeth observed by 3-D imaging.
    Fukagawa H; Motegi E; Fuma A; Nomura M; Kano M; Sueishi K; Okano S
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2010; 51(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 20689237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Measurement of the buccolingual inclination of teeth: manual technique vs 3-dimensional software.
    Nouri M; Abdi AH; Farzan A; Mokhtarpour F; Baghban AA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Oct; 146(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 25263155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dentoalveolar development in subjects with normal occlusion. A longitudinal study between the ages of 5 and 31 years.
    Thilander B
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Apr; 31(2):109-20. PubMed ID: 19304760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Mixed dentition analysis in a Moroccan population.
    Diagne F; Diop-Ba K; Ngom PI; El Boury O
    Odontostomatol Trop; 2004 Dec; 27(108):5-10. PubMed ID: 15853270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of normal permanent and primary dentition sagittal tooth-crown inclinations of Japanese females.
    Inada E; Saitoh I; Hayasaki H; Iwase Y; Kubota N; Takemoto Y; Yamasaki Y
    Cranio; 2012 Jan; 30(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 22435176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The apparent contact dimension and covariates among orthodontically treated and nontreated subjects.
    Raj V; Heymann HO; Hershey HG; Ritter AV; Casko JS
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(2):96-111. PubMed ID: 19368599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Regression equations for determining mesiodistal crown diameters of canines and premolars.
    Legović M; Novosel A; Legović A
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Jun; 73(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 12828441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Tooth size and dental arch dimensions: a stereophotogrammetric study in Southeast Asian Malays.
    Al-Khatib AR; Rajion ZA; Masudi SM; Hassan R; Anderson PJ; Townsend GC
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2011 Nov; 14(4):243-53. PubMed ID: 22008304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The crown angulations and inclinations in Dravidian population with normal occlusion.
    Kannabiran P; Thirukonda GJ; Mahendra L
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 22842250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mesiodistal angulation and faciolingual inclination of each whole tooth in 3-dimensional space in patients with near-normal occlusion.
    Tong H; Kwon D; Shi J; Sakai N; Enciso R; Sameshima GT
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):604-17. PubMed ID: 22554755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interarch tooth size relationship of Indian population: does Bolton's analysis apply?
    Subbarao VV; Regalla RR; Santi V; Anita G; Kattimani VS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 Jan; 15(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 24939274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Intermaxillary tooth size discrepancy and mesiodistal crown dimensions for a Turkish population.
    Uysal T; Sari Z
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Aug; 128(2):226-30. PubMed ID: 16102409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pattern of maxillary and mandibular proximal enamel thickness at the contact area of the permanent dentition from first molar to first molar.
    Sarig R; Vardimon AD; Sussan C; Benny L; Sarne O; Hershkovitz I; Shpack N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Apr; 147(4):435-44. PubMed ID: 25836003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of regression equation using widths of mandibular permanent first molars and incisors as a predictor of widths of mandibular canines and premolars in contemporary Indian population.
    Shah S; Bhaskar V; Venkataraghvan K; Choudhary P; Mahadevan G; Trivedi K
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2013; 31(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 24021321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Buccolingual size asymmetry and its developmental meaning.
    Garn SM; Lewis AB; Kerewsky RS
    Angle Orthod; 1967 Jul; 37(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 19919214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Objective assessment of occlusal and coronal characteristics of untreated normals: a measurement study.
    Currim S; Wadkar PV
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 May; 125(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 15127027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a photographic method to measure dental angulation.
    Amorim JR; Macedo DV; Normando D
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2014; 19(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 24945518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mesiodistal crown dimensions of the permanent dentition in North Indian children.
    Singh SP; Goyal A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2006 Dec; 24(4):192-6. PubMed ID: 17183183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.