These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209189)

  • 1. Preoperative evaluation of bone quality and bone density using a novel CT/microCT-based hard-normal-soft classification system.
    Rebaudi A; Trisi P; Cella R; Cecchini G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(1):75-85. PubMed ID: 20209189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bone mineral density and bone histomorphometry are statistically related.
    Todisco M; Trisi P
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(6):898-904. PubMed ID: 16392347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 3. Bone quality evaluation during osteotomy and implant placement.
    Lee S; Gantes B; Riggs M; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 17465345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of bone quality of 372 implant recipient sites using Hounsfield unit from computerized tomography: a clinical study.
    Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; Yilmaz B; Ersoy AE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2008 Dec; 10(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18384408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tactile sense of the surgeon in determining bone density when placing dental implant.
    Rokn A; Rasouli Ghahroudi AA; Daneshmonfared M; Menasheof R; Shamshiri AR
    Implant Dent; 2014 Dec; 23(6):697-703. PubMed ID: 25347271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The possible association among bone density values, resonance frequency measurements, tactile sense, and histomorphometric evaluations of dental implant osteotomy sites: a preliminary study.
    Aksoy U; Eratalay K; Tözüm TF
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):316-25. PubMed ID: 19667820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessments of trabecular bone density at implant sites on CT images.
    de Oliveira RC; Leles CR; Normanha LM; Lindh C; Ribeiro-Rotta RF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 18230392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bone reactions to controlled loading of endosseous implants: a pilot study.
    Wiskott HW; Cugnoni J; Scherrer SS; Ammann P; Botsis J; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1093-102. PubMed ID: 18983311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implant stability and bone density: assessment of correlation in fresh cadavers using conventional and osteotome implant sockets.
    Cehreli MC; Kökat AM; Comert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Akça K
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1163-9. PubMed ID: 19681964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone and cutting torque values at implant placement: a clinical study.
    Ikumi N; Tsutsumi S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):253-60. PubMed ID: 15839119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bone density assessments of dental implant sites: 2. Quantitative cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Aranyarachkul P; Caruso J; Gantes B; Schulz E; Riggs M; Dus I; Yamada JM; Crigger M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(3):416-24. PubMed ID: 15973953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of correlation between computerized tomography values of the bone, and maximum torque and resonance frequency values at dental implant placement.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C; Ozbek EN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Dec; 33(12):881-8. PubMed ID: 17168930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relations between the bone density values from computerized tomography, and implant stability parameters: a clinical study of 230 regular platform implants.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tumer C; Ozbek EN; Tözüm TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Aug; 34(8):716-22. PubMed ID: 17635248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary stability and histomorphometric bone-implant contact of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants.
    Çehreli S; Arman-Özçırpıcı A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 22284286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation between micro-computed tomography and histomorphometry for assessment of new bone formation in a calvarial experimental model.
    Yeom H; Blanchard S; Kim S; Zunt S; Chu TM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Mar; 19(2):446-52. PubMed ID: 18362725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study.
    Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; McGlumphy EA; Tözüm TF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):113-9. PubMed ID: 18422713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bone density assessments of oral implant sites using computerized tomography.
    Turkyilmaz I; Tözüm TF; Tumer C
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Apr; 34(4):267-72. PubMed ID: 17371564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone density at implant sites and its relationship to assessment of bone quality and treatment outcome.
    Bergkvist G; Koh KJ; Sahlholm S; Klintström E; Lindh C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):321-8. PubMed ID: 20369091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Density of the alveolar and basal bones of the maxilla and the mandible.
    Park HS; Lee YJ; Jeong SH; Kwon TG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jan; 133(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 18174068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison insight bone measurements by histomorphometry and microCT.
    Chappard D; Retailleau-Gaborit N; Legrand E; Baslé MF; Audran M
    J Bone Miner Res; 2005 Jul; 20(7):1177-84. PubMed ID: 15940370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.