BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209197)

  • 21. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
    Gibbard LL; Zarb G
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 68(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 11869501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery.
    Cooper L; Felton DA; Kugelberg CF; Ellner S; Chaffee N; Molina AL; Moriarty JD; Paquette D; Palmqvist U
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 11324206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
    Jemt T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
    Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TIO2 grit-blasted implant restorations: a controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part I: Clinical outcome.
    Bousdras VA; Sindet-Pedersen S; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Naert IE; Jaecques S; Goodship AE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 18031441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Immediate loading of single SLA implants: drilling vs. osteotomes for the preparation of the implant site.
    Stavropoulos A; Nyengaard JR; Lang NP; Karring T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 17956566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications.
    Ganeles J; Wismeijer D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():92-102. PubMed ID: 15635949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
    Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
    Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations.
    Schulte J; Flores AM; Weed M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17631168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
    Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
    Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
    Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Use of wide-diameter and standard-diameter implants to replace single molars: two case presentations.
    Blatz MB; Strub JR; Gläser R; Gebhardt W
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 9759000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
    Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
    Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
    Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants.
    Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Rasmusson L
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9728117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.