122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209197)
21. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements.
Gibbard LL; Zarb G
J Can Dent Assoc; 2002 Feb; 68(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 11869501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery.
Cooper L; Felton DA; Kugelberg CF; Ellner S; Chaffee N; Molina AL; Moriarty JD; Paquette D; Palmqvist U
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 11324206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cemented CeraOne and porcelain fused to TiAdapt abutment single-implant crown restorations: a 10-year comparative follow-up study.
Jemt T
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):303-10. PubMed ID: 18783414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A 4-year prospective study to assess peri-implant hard and soft tissues adjacent to titanium versus gold-alloy abutments in cemented single implant crowns.
Vigolo P; Givani A; Majzoub Z; Cordioli G
J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(4):250-6. PubMed ID: 16827738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Immediate functional loading of single-tooth TIO2 grit-blasted implant restorations: a controlled prospective study in a porcine model. Part I: Clinical outcome.
Bousdras VA; Sindet-Pedersen S; Cunningham JL; Blunn G; Petrie A; Naert IE; Jaecques S; Goodship AE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):197-206. PubMed ID: 18031441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Immediate loading of single SLA implants: drilling vs. osteotomes for the preparation of the implant site.
Stavropoulos A; Nyengaard JR; Lang NP; Karring T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 17956566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Early and immediately restored and loaded dental implants for single-tooth and partial-arch applications.
Ganeles J; Wismeijer D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():92-102. PubMed ID: 15635949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Two-year prospective clinical comparison of immediate replacement vs. immediate restoration of single tooth in the esthetic zone.
Palattella P; Torsello F; Cordaro L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1148-53. PubMed ID: 18983318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Zirconia-implant-supported all-ceramic crowns withstand long-term load: a pilot investigation.
Kohal RJ; Klaus G; Strub JR
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16958698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations.
Schulte J; Flores AM; Weed M
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jul; 98(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 17631168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A study on the fracture strength of implant-supported restorations using milled ceramic abutments and all-ceramic crowns.
Cho HW; Dong JK; Jin TH; Oh SC; Lee HH; Lee JW
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 11887605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Retrospective evaluation of complete-arch fixed partial dentures connecting teeth and implant abutments in patients with normal and reduced periodontal support.
Cordaro L; Ercoli C; Rossini C; Torsello F; Feng C
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Oct; 94(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 16198167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Replacement of mandibular molars with single-unit restorations supported by wide-body implants: immediate versus delayed loading. A randomized controlled study.
Schincaglia GP; Marzola R; Giovanni GF; Chiara CS; Scotti R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):474-80. PubMed ID: 18700371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Use of wide-diameter and standard-diameter implants to replace single molars: two case presentations.
Blatz MB; Strub JR; Gläser R; Gebhardt W
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 9759000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Electromyographic analysis of masticatory and neck muscles in subjects with natural dentition, teeth-supported and implant-supported prostheses.
Tartaglia GM; Testori T; Pallavera A; Marelli B; Sforza C
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1081-8. PubMed ID: 18828826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
Walton TR
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Single-tooth replacement with the Frialit-2 system: a retrospective clinical analysis of 146 implants.
Krennmair G; Schmidinger S; Waldenberger O
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 11858577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Maintenance requirements of implant-supported fixed prostheses opposed by implant-supported fixed prostheses, natural teeth, or complete dentures: a 5-year retrospective study.
Davis DM; Packer ME; Watson RM
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):521-3. PubMed ID: 14651238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants.
Erneklint C; Odman P; Ortengren U; Rasmusson L
Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 9728117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]