308 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20209622)
61. Comparison of three cytologic preparation methods and immunocytochemistries to distinguish adenocarcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusion.
Ueda J; Iwata T; Ono M; Takahashi M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Jan; 34(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 16355377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Application of immunocytochemistry to the cytologic study of peritoneal fluids in patients with ovarian cancer.
Shinozuka T; Ebisawa K; Miyamoto T; Murakami M; Fujii A; Osamura Y
Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Oct; 43(10):1355-62. PubMed ID: 1955789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Significance of cell proliferation markers (Minichromosome maintenance protein 7, topoisomerase IIalpha and Ki-67) in cavital fluid cytology: can we differentiate reactive mesothelial cells from malignant cells?
Kimura F; Kawamura J; Watanabe J; Kamoshida S; Kawai K; Okayasu I; Kuwao S
Diagn Cytopathol; 2010 Mar; 38(3):161-7. PubMed ID: 19821496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Role of PCNA in differentiating between malignant mesothelioma and mesothelial hyperplasia: prognostic considerations.
Esposito V; Baldi A; De Luca A; Paciocco G; Gröger A; Sgaramella G; Claudio PP; Giordano GG; Baldi F; Caputi M; Kaiser H; Giordano A
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(1B):601-4. PubMed ID: 9066586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Detection of tumor cells in body cavity fluids by flow cytometric and immunocytochemical analysis.
Krishan A; Ganjei-Azar P; Jorda M; Hamelik RM; Reis IM; Nadji M
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Aug; 34(8):528-41. PubMed ID: 16850481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Lower proliferation rate in metastatic effusion mesothelial cells than in benign effusions.
Rehnberg J; Zendehrokh N; Dejmek A
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2007 Aug; 29(4):217-20. PubMed ID: 17879629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Use of desmin immunohistochemistry to distinguish between mesothelial cells and carcinoma in serous fluid cell block preparations.
Gill SA; Meier PA; Kendall BS
Acta Cytol; 2000; 44(6):976-80. PubMed ID: 11127755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The role of BRCA1-associated protein 1 in the diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma in effusion and fine-needle aspiration cytology.
Hatem L; McIntire PJ; He B; Gogineni S; Ho M; Mathew S; Margolskee EM; Siddiqui MT; Rao RA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Mar; 47(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30520251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids.
Afify A; Zhou H; Howell L; Paulino AF
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(6):621-6. PubMed ID: 16450901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Accuracy of immunohistochemistry in evaluation of malignant pleural and peritoneal effusions.
Ensani F; Nematizadeh F; Irvanlou G
Pol J Pathol; 2011; 62(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 21866465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Peritoneal malignant mesothelioma (PMM), and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma (PPSC) and reactive mesothelial hyperplasia (RMH) of the peritoneum. Immunohistochemical and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) analyses.
Kawai T; Tominaga S; Hiroi S; Ogata S; Nakanishi K; Kawahara K; Sonobe H; Hiroshima K
J Clin Pathol; 2016 Aug; 69(8):706-12. PubMed ID: 26729015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. The diagnostic value of Ki-67 and repp86 in distinguishing between benign and malignant mesothelial proliferations.
Taheri ZM; Mehrafza M; Mohammadi F; Khoddami M; Bahadori M; Masjedi MR
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2008 Apr; 132(4):694-7. PubMed ID: 18384222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Calretinin staining pattern aids in the differentiation of mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma in serous effusions.
Chhieng DC; Yee H; Schaefer D; Cangiarella JF; Jagirdar J; Chiriboga LA; Jagirdar J; Chiriboga LA; Cohen JM
Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 10896333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Oncofetal protein IMP3, a new diagnostic biomarker to distinguish malignant mesothelioma from reactive mesothelial proliferation.
Shi M; Fraire AE; Chu P; Cornejo K; Woda BA; Dresser K; Rock KL; Jiang Z
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Jun; 35(6):878-82. PubMed ID: 21566519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. IMP3/L523S, a novel immunocytochemical marker that distinguishes benign and malignant cells: the expression profiles of IMP3/L523S in effusion cytology.
Ikeda K; Tate G; Suzuki T; Kitamura T; Mitsuya T
Hum Pathol; 2010 May; 41(5):745-50. PubMed ID: 20060157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Significance of epithelial membrane antigen in the work-up of problematic serous effusions.
Singh HK; Silverman JF; Berns L; Haddad MG; Park HK
Diagn Cytopathol; 1995 Jul; 13(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 7587872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Utility of BerEp4/calretinin and desmin/epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) dual immunocytochemical staining in effusion cytology.
Hjerpe A; Demir E; Abd-Own S; Dobra K
Cancer Med; 2023 Mar; 12(5):5334-5340. PubMed ID: 36259232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Assessment of immunocytochemical and histochemical stainings in the distinction between reactive mesothelial cells and adenocarcinoma cells in body effusions.
Chen CJ; Chang SC; Tseng HH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1994 Sep; 54(3):149-55. PubMed ID: 7954054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. An improved flow cytometric assay for detection and discrimination between malignant cells and atypical mesothelial cells, in serous cavity effusions.
Kentrou NA; Tsagarakis NJ; Tzanetou K; Damala M; Papadimitriou KA; Skoumi D; Stratigaki A; Anagnostopoulos NI; Malamou-Lada E; Athanassiadou P; Paterakis G
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2011 Sep; 80(5):324-34. PubMed ID: 21695775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Cytologic re-evaluation of negative effusions from patients with malignant mesothelioma.
Ascoli V; Bosco D; Carnovale Scalzo C
Pathologica; 2011 Dec; 103(6):318-24. PubMed ID: 22558888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
