These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20210632)
1. Evaluation of maxillary permanent molars in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis after monobloc osteotomy and midface advancement with rigid external distraction (RED). Sant'Anna EF; de A Cury-Saramago A; Figueroa AA; Polley JW Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Mar; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 20210632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Eruption of Maxillary Posterior Permanent Molars following Early Conventional Le Fort III Advancement and Early Le Fort III Distraction Procedures Compared to Late Surgical Intervention. Gonchar MN; Bekisz JM; Grayson BH; McCarthy JG; Shetye PR Plast Reconstr Surg; 2019 Mar; 143(3):565e-571e. PubMed ID: 30817661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of cephalometric points in midface bone lengthening with the use of a rigid external device in syndromic craniosynostosis patients. Lima DS; Alonso N; Câmara PR; Goldenberg DC Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2009; 75(3):395-406. PubMed ID: 19649491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth. Ko EW; Chen PK; Tai IC; Huang CS Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 22094394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Follow-Up on Bone Stability and Complication Rate after Monobloc Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis. Raposo-Amaral CE; Denadai R; Zanco GL; Ghizoni E; Raposo-Amaral CA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 32221227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Localization of first permanent molars in lateral cephalometric and panoramic radiographs from early mixed dentition to early permanent dentition. Tsai HH J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2001; 25(4):303-6. PubMed ID: 11497011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of Monobloc/Le Fort III Surgery on the Developing Posterior Maxillary Dentition and Its Resultant Effect on Orthognathic Surgery. Yang R; Shakoori P; Lanni MA; Nah HD; Scott M; Swanson JW; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA Plast Reconstr Surg; 2021 Feb; 147(2):253e-259e. PubMed ID: 33235043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aberrant facial flushing following monobloc fronto-facial distraction. Cobb AR; Vourvachis M; Ahmed J; Wyatt M; Dunaway D; Hayward R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 43(8):1511-5. PubMed ID: 26293186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deciduous dentition-anchored rapid maxillary expansion in crossbite and non-crossbite mixed dentition patients: reaction of the permanent first molar. Cozzani M; Rosa M; Cozzani P; Siciliani G Prog Orthod; 2003; 4():15-22. PubMed ID: 12887575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Anterior maxillary segmental distraction for correction of maxillary hypoplasia and dental crowding in cleft palate patients: a preliminary report. Wang XX; Wang X; Li ZL; Yi B; Liang C; Jia YL; Zou BS Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Dec; 38(12):1237-43. PubMed ID: 19720499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Nonunion of the external maxillary distraction in cleft lip and palate: analysis of possible reasons. He D; Genecov DG; Barcelo R J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2402-11. PubMed ID: 20605305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional computed tomographic evaluation of Le Fort III distraction osteogenesis with an external device in syndromic craniosynostosis. Wery MF; Nada RM; van der Meulen JJ; Wolvius EB; Ongkosuwito EM Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 53(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 25605236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Three-dimensional image analysis of facial skeletal changes after monobloc and bipartition distraction. Ponniah AJT; Witherow H; Richards R; Evans R; Hayward R; Dunaway D Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jul; 122(1):225-231. PubMed ID: 18594409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term skeletal stability after maxillary advancement with distraction osteogenesis in nongrowing patients. Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Hosoe M; Sukegawa S; Yamauchi K; Furuki Y J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Sep; 66(9):1833-46. PubMed ID: 18718390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of mandibular distraction osteogenesis on developing molars. Kleine-Hakala M; Hukki J; Hurmerinta K Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):196-202. PubMed ID: 17973686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mandibular second molar eruption difficulties related to the maintenance of arch perimeter in the mixed dentition. Rubin RL; Baccetti T; McNamara JA Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Feb; 141(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 22284281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction. Tonello C; Cevidanes LHS; Ruellas ACO; Alonso N J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 33136785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]