BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20211124)

  • 1. Partial deafness cochlear implantation at the University of Kansas: techniques and outcomes.
    Prentiss S; Sykes K; Staecker H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Mar; 21(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 20211124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preservation of residual hearing with cochlear implantation: how and why.
    James C; Albegger K; Battmer R; Burdo S; Deggouj N; Deguine O; Dillier N; Gersdorff M; Laszig R; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Mondain M; Offeciers E; Macías AR; Ramsden R; Sterkers O; Von Wallenberg E; Weber B; Fraysse B
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 May; 125(5):481-91. PubMed ID: 16092537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preservation of hearing in cochlear implant surgery: advantages of combined electrical and acoustical speech processing.
    Gantz BJ; Turner C; Gfeller KE; Lowder MW
    Laryngoscope; 2005 May; 115(5):796-802. PubMed ID: 15867642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J; Greenstein T; Peled M; Ulanovski D; Wohlgelernter J; Raveh E
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of residual hearing in traditional cochlear implant candidates after implantation with a conventional electrode.
    Cosetti MK; Friedmann DR; Zhu BZ; Heman-Ackah SE; Fang Y; Keller RG; Shapiro WH; Roland JT; Waltzman SB
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Apr; 34(3):516-21. PubMed ID: 23449440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing preservation in cochlear implantation for electric acoustic stimulation.
    Gstoettner W; Kiefer J; Baumgartner WD; Pok S; Peters S; Adunka O
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2004 May; 124(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 15224851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cochlear implantation with the nucleus slim straight electrode in subjects with residual low-frequency hearing.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(2):e33-43. PubMed ID: 24556970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Partial deafness treatment with the nucleus straight research array cochlear implant.
    Skarzynski H; Lorens A; Matusiak M; Porowski M; Skarzynski PH; James CJ
    Audiol Neurootol; 2012; 17(2):82-91. PubMed ID: 21846981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Residual hearing conservation and electroacoustic stimulation with the nucleus 24 contour advance cochlear implant.
    Fraysse B; Macías AR; Sterkers O; Burdo S; Ramsden R; Deguine O; Klenzner T; Lenarz T; Rodriguez MM; Von Wallenberg E; James C
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):624-33. PubMed ID: 16868510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Rader T; Stöver T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Oct; 37(9):e353-9. PubMed ID: 27631659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hearing Preservation Outcomes With Standard Length Electrodes in Adult Cochlear Implantation and the Uptake of Electroacoustic Stimulation.
    Harrison L; Manjaly JG; Ellis W; Lavy JA; Shaida A; Khalil SS; Saeed SR
    Otol Neurotol; 2020 Sep; 41(8):1060-1065. PubMed ID: 32569131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
    Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
    Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.
    Helbig S; Adel Y; Leinung M; Stöver T; Baumann U; Weissgerber T
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Aug; 39(7):834-841. PubMed ID: 29912820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preserved acoustic hearing in cochlear implantation improves speech perception.
    Sheffield SW; Jahn K; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 25690775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Possibilities for residual hearing preservation with Nucleus CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode array. Case report].
    Nagy R; Jarabin JA; Dimák B; Perényi Á; Tóth F; Szűts V; Jóri J; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Orv Hetil; 2018 Oct; 159(41):1680-1688. PubMed ID: 30295044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of hearing preservation on electrical thresholds and speech performances in cochlear implantation.
    D'Elia A; Bartoli R; Giagnotti F; Quaranta N
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):343-7. PubMed ID: 22388729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array.
    Durakovic N; Kallogjeri D; Wick CC; McJunkin JL; Buchman CA; Herzog J
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2020 May; 162(5):731-736. PubMed ID: 32180504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.
    Carlson ML; Driscoll CL; Gifford RH; Service GJ; Tombers NM; Hughes-Borst BJ; Neff BA; Beatty CW
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Aug; 32(6):962-8. PubMed ID: 21659922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.