BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

532 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20211266)

  • 1. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Ou W; Nummenmaa A; Ahveninen J; Belliveau JW; Hämäläinen MS; Golland P
    Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(1):97-108. PubMed ID: 20211266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Oun W; Numënmaa A; Hämäläinen M; Golland P
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2009; 21():88-100. PubMed ID: 19694255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multimodal functional imaging using fMRI-informed regional EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Ou W; Nummenmaa A; Golland P; Hamalainen MS
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2009; 2009():1926-9. PubMed ID: 19964568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EEG/MEG source imaging using fMRI informed time-variant constraints.
    Xu J; Sheng J; Qian T; Luo YJ; Gao JH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2018 Apr; 39(4):1700-1711. PubMed ID: 29293277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of neural dynamics from MEG/EEG cortical current density maps: application to the reconstruction of large-scale cortical synchrony.
    David O; Garnero L; Cosmelli D; Varela FJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Sep; 49(9):975-87. PubMed ID: 12214887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Monte Carlo simulation studies of EEG and MEG localization accuracy.
    Liu AK; Dale AM; Belliveau JW
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2002 May; 16(1):47-62. PubMed ID: 11870926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Automated model selection in covariance estimation and spatial whitening of MEG and EEG signals.
    Engemann DA; Gramfort A
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():328-42. PubMed ID: 25541187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integrated MEG/EEG and fMRI model based on neural masses.
    Babajani A; Soltanian-Zadeh H
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Sep; 53(9):1794-801. PubMed ID: 16941835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differences between MEG and high-density EEG source localizations using a distributed source model in comparison to fMRI.
    Klamer S; Elshahabi A; Lerche H; Braun C; Erb M; Scheffler K; Focke NK
    Brain Topogr; 2015 Jan; 28(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 25296614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A three domain covariance framework for EEG/MEG data.
    Roś BP; Bijma F; de Gunst MC; de Munck JC
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 119():305-15. PubMed ID: 26072253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A technique to consider mismatches between fMRI and EEG/MEG sources for fMRI-constrained EEG/MEG source imaging: a preliminary simulation study.
    Im CH; Lee SY
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Dec; 51(23):6005-21. PubMed ID: 17110766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics.
    Srinivasan R; Winter WR; Ding J; Nunez PL
    J Neurosci Methods; 2007 Oct; 166(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 17698205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sparse current source estimation for MEG using loose orientation constraints.
    Chang WT; Ahlfors SP; Lin FH
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2013 Sep; 34(9):2190-201. PubMed ID: 22438263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Localization Estimation Algorithm (LEA): a supervised prior-based approach for solving the EEG/MEG inverse problem.
    Mattout J; Pélégrini-Issac M; Bellio A; Daunizeau J; Benali H
    Inf Process Med Imaging; 2003 Jul; 18():536-47. PubMed ID: 15344486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How to use fMRI functional localizers to improve EEG/MEG source estimation.
    Cottereau BR; Ales JM; Norcia AM
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Jul; 250():64-73. PubMed ID: 25088693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of MEG source reconstruction method on source-space connectivity estimation: A comparison between minimum-norm solution and beamforming.
    Hincapié AS; Kujala J; Mattout J; Pascarella A; Daligault S; Delpuech C; Mery D; Cosmelli D; Jerbi K
    Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():29-42. PubMed ID: 28479475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multimodal integration of EEG, MEG and fMRI data for the solution of the neuroimage puzzle.
    Babiloni F; Mattia D; Babiloni C; Astolfi L; Salinari S; Basilisco A; Rossini PM; Marciani MG; Cincotti F
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Dec; 22(10):1471-6. PubMed ID: 15707796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical constraints on source models for high-resolution EEG and MEG derived from MRI.
    Srinivasan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2006 Aug; 5(4):389-99. PubMed ID: 16866569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A novel integrated MEG and EEG analysis method for dipolar sources.
    Huang MX; Song T; Hagler DJ; Podgorny I; Jousmaki V; Cui L; Gaa K; Harrington DL; Dale AM; Lee RR; Elman J; Halgren E
    Neuroimage; 2007 Sep; 37(3):731-48. PubMed ID: 17658272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. fMRI-constrained MEG source imaging and consideration of fMRI invisible sources.
    Im CH; Jung HK; Fujimaki N
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2005 Oct; 26(2):110-8. PubMed ID: 15858829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.