These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

65 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20211443)

  • 41. SILICONE FLUID AS A LUBRICANT FOR ARTIFICIAL EYES.
    MORGAN JF; HILL JC
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1964 Nov; 58():767-74. PubMed ID: 14220488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. [Questionnaire of the psychosocial profile of the patient with anophthalmia with indication of ocular prosthesis].
    Nicodemo D; Ferreira LM
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2006; 69(4):463-70. PubMed ID: 17119714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. An innovative and simple approach to fabricate a hollow ocular prosthesis with functional lubricant reservoir: A solution to artificial eye comfort.
    Kavlekar AA; Aras MA; Chitre V
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(2):196-202. PubMed ID: 28584422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Questionnaire study to gain an insight into the manufacturing and fitting process of artificial eyes in children: an ocularist perspective.
    Chinnery H; Thompson SBN; Noroozi S; Dyer B; Rees K
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Oct; 37(5):1175-1183. PubMed ID: 27796730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Custom ocular prosthesis with dilating pupil.
    Cain JR; LaFuente H; Small RG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Jun; 49(6):795-8. PubMed ID: 6576133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The patient with an ocular prosthesis and his mirror image.
    Mombaerts I; Missotten L
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011; 27(5):343-7. PubMed ID: 21464782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The UK National Artificial Eye Questionnaire Study: comparisons between cosmetic shell and artificial eye users. Part 2: maintenance, management and quality of life.
    Ullrich K; Worrell E; Shapira Y; Litwin A; Malhotra R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2022 May; 106(5):736-740. PubMed ID: 33397655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A detergent-lubricant solution for artificial eyes.
    Goldfarb HJ; Turtz AI
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1966 Jun; 61(6):1502-5. PubMed ID: 5938318
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Ocularists the less known mid eye care professionals and their contribution in eye health care.
    Changal N; AlRasheed W; Khandekar R
    Saudi J Ophthalmol; 2020; 34(3):195-197. PubMed ID: 34085013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fabrication of a magnetic holder for the removal of ocular prosthesis.
    Rao DB; Malya A; Chandra KB; Nair KC
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):72-75. PubMed ID: 29430146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Postinsertion care of the ocular prosthesis.
    Parr GR; Goldman BM; Rahn AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Feb; 49(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 6572260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Management of external ocular prosthesis by ocularists: results of an online survey conducted in Brazil and Spain.
    Martinez-Fernandez E; Pereira Bigheti C; Sanchez-Tocino H; Moreira Zornoff D; Schellini SA; Galindo-Ferreiro A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):4297-4304. PubMed ID: 37574470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. In vitro evaluation of the effect of different disinfectants on the biofilm of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus formed on acrylic ocular prostheses.
    Moreno A; Dos Santos DM; Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto C; Luiz de Melo Moreno A; de Magalhães Bertoz AP; Goiato MC
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0240116. PubMed ID: 33044989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Volumetric expansion of ocular defect with progressive conformers: An objective assessment.
    Aggarwal H; Shah V; Singh SV; Arya D
    Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2019; 10(1):123-125. PubMed ID: 31205403
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Concerns of anophthalmic patients-a comparison between cryolite glass and polymethyl methacrylate prosthetic eye wearers.
    Rokohl AC; Koch KR; Adler W; Trester M; Trester W; Pine NS; Pine KR; Heindl LM
    Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 256(6):1203-1208. PubMed ID: 29502234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Ocular prosthetics. Fitting, daily use and complications].
    Koch KR; Trester W; Müller-Uri N; Trester M; Cursiefen C; Heindl LM
    Ophthalmologe; 2016 Feb; 113(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 26160105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A survey of prosthetic eye wearers to investigate mucoid discharge.
    Pine K; Sloan B; Stewart J; Jacobs RJ
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2012; 6():707-13. PubMed ID: 22654496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A survey of recommendations on the care of ocular prostheses.
    Osborn KL; Hettler D
    Optometry; 2010 Mar; 81(3):142-5. PubMed ID: 20211443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.
    Sneed RC; May WL; Stencel C
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e612-25. PubMed ID: 15520092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.