These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20211917)

  • 21. The effect of aging on luminance of standard liquid crystal display (LCD) monitors.
    Hellén-Halme K; Hellén-Halme B; Wenzel A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Aug; 112(2):237-42. PubMed ID: 21664841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Detectability decreases with off-normal viewing in medical liquid crystal displays.
    Badano A; Gallas BD
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 16428057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Transpost: a novel approach to the display and transmission of 360 degrees-viewable 3D solid images.
    Otsuka R; Hoshino T; Horry Y
    IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph; 2006; 12(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16509377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Chromaticity and correlated color temperature of the white point in medical liquid-crystal display.
    Akamine H; Morishita J; Matsuyama M; Nakamura Y; Hashimoto N; Toyofuku F
    Med Phys; 2012 Aug; 39(8):5127-35. PubMed ID: 22894438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accurate color measurement methods for medical displays.
    Saha A; Kelley EF; Badano A
    Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 20175468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of ambient illumination, luminance contrast, and stimulus type on subjective preference of VDT target and background color combinations.
    Shieh KK; Lai YK
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Oct; 107(2):336-52. PubMed ID: 19093596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diffusion-weighted imaging in ischemic stroke: effect of display method on observers' diagnostic performance.
    Hirai T; Sasaki M; Maeda M; Ida M; Katsuragawa S; Sakoh M; Takano K; Arai S; Hirano T; Kai Y; Kakeda S; Murakami R; Ikeda R; Fukuoka H; Sasao A; Yamashita Y;
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Mar; 16(3):305-12. PubMed ID: 19201359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. GAFFE: a gaze-attentive fixation finding engine.
    Rajashekar U; van der Linde I; Bovik AC; Cormack LK
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Apr; 17(4):564-73. PubMed ID: 18390364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mumford and Shah functional: VLSI analysis and implementation.
    Martina M; Masera G
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 Mar; 28(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 16526435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Technology and perception in the 21st-century reading room.
    Krupinski EA
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2006 Jun; 3(6):433-40. PubMed ID: 17412098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Virtual image display as a backlight for 3D.
    Travis A; MacCrann N; Emerton N; Kollin J; Georgiou A; Lanier J; Bathiche S
    Opt Express; 2013 Jul; 21(15):17730-5. PubMed ID: 23938645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Evaluating imaging systems: practical applications.
    Båth M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):26-36. PubMed ID: 20147386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimization of reading conditions for flat panel displays.
    Thomas JA; Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Maslennikov A; Mitchell CA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2006 Jun; 19(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 16437286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The SKILL Card. An acuity test of reduced luminance and contrast. Smith-Kettlewell Institute Low Luminance.
    Haegerstrom-Portnoy G; Brabyn J; Schneck ME; Jampolsky A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Jan; 38(1):207-18. PubMed ID: 9008645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Assessment of flat panel LCD primary class display performance based on AAPM TG 18 acceptance protocol.
    Jung H; Kim HJ; Kang WS; Yoo SK; Fujioka K; Hasegawa M; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2155-64. PubMed ID: 15305470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. On resolution and viewing of holographic image generated by 3D holographic display.
    Kozacki T
    Opt Express; 2010 Dec; 18(26):27118-29. PubMed ID: 21196988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of ultrasound monitor image display performance.
    Moore SC; Munnings CR; Brettle DS; Evans JA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Jun; 37(6):971-9. PubMed ID: 21601138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sonography under Daylight Conditions.
    Bleck JS; Gebel M; Witt B; Schmitt KJ; Breitkopf P; Westhoff-Bleck M; Wagner S; Göke M; Caselitz M; Schneider A; Strassburg C; Boozari B; Manns M
    Ultraschall Med; 1998 Dec; 19(6):259-64. PubMed ID: 10028560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of room illuminance on monitor black level luminance and monitor calibration.
    Chakrabarti K; Kaczmarek RV; Thomas JA; Romanyukha A
    J Digit Imaging; 2003 Dec; 16(4):350-5. PubMed ID: 14747935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.