These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20212102)
1. Bone particles and the undersized surgical technique. Tabassum A; Walboomers XF; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA J Dent Res; 2010 Jun; 89(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 20212102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of surface roughness on the displacement of osteogenic bone particles during placement of titanium screw-type implants. Tabassum A; Walboomers F; Wolke JG; Meijer GJ; Jansen JA Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Dec; 13(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 19673924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with different cortical thickness: a laboratory study. Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Feb; 21(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 20070754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of implant surface roughness and surgical technique on implant fixation in an in vitro model. Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Apr; 17(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16584413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques. Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Walboomers XF; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):487-92. PubMed ID: 23638908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of the surgical technique and surface roughness on the primary stability of an implant in artificial bone with a density equivalent to maxillary bone: a laboratory study. Tabassum A; Meijer GJ; Wolke JG; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):327-32. PubMed ID: 19298286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Histological evaluation of oral implants inserted with different surgical techniques into the trabecular bone of goats. Shalabi MM; Wolke JG; de Ruijter AJ; Jansen JA Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):489-95. PubMed ID: 17517059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Influence of defect depth on resonance frequency analysis and insertion torque values for implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: a human cadaver study. Turkyilmaz I; Sennerby L; Yilmaz B; Bilecenoglu B; Ozbek EN Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18384400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of drilling dimension on implant placement torque and early osseointegration stages: an experimental study in dogs. Campos FE; Gomes JB; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Suzuki M; Witek L; Zanetta-Barbosa D; Coelho PG J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 70(1):e43-50. PubMed ID: 22182660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of surgical technique, implant shape and diameter on the primary stability in cancellous bone. Bilhan H; Geckili O; Mumcu E; Bozdag E; Sünbüloğlu E; Kutay O J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 37(12):900-7. PubMed ID: 20529176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of surgical techniques on primary implant stability and peri-implant bone. Fanuscu MI; Chang TL; Akça K J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2487-91. PubMed ID: 18022474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Study of the osseointegration of dental implants placed with an adapted surgical technique. Al-Marshood MM; Junker R; Al-Rasheed A; Al Farraj Aldosari A; Jansen JA; Anil S Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jul; 22(7):753-759. PubMed ID: 21198894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary stability of turned and acid-etched screw-type implants: a removal torque and histomorphometric study in rabbits. Fernandes Ede L; Unikowski IL; Teixeira ER; da Costa NP; Shinkai RS Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 18271369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peri-implant osteogenesis in health and osteoporosis. Marco F; Milena F; Gianluca G; Vittoria O Micron; 2005; 36(7-8):630-44. PubMed ID: 16182543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo. Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Influence of implant shape, surface morphology, surgical technique and bone quality on the primary stability of dental implants. Elias CN; Rocha FA; Nascimento AL; Coelho PG J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Dec; 16():169-80. PubMed ID: 23182386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chronological changes in the ultrastructure of titanium-bone interfaces: analysis by light microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and micro-computed tomography. Morinaga K; Kido H; Sato A; Watazu A; Matsuura M Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Mar; 11(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 18384402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Torque-fitting and resonance frequency analyses of implants in conventional sockets versus controlled bone defects in vitro. Akça K; Kökat AM; Cömert A; Akkocaoğlu M; Tekdemir I; Cehreli MC Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Feb; 39(2):169-73. PubMed ID: 20036107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The combined effects of undersized drilling and implant macrogeometry on bone healing around dental implants: an experimental study. Jimbo R; Tovar N; Anchieta RB; Machado LS; Marin C; Teixeira HS; Coelho PG Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 43(10):1269-75. PubMed ID: 24794761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Adapted preparation technique for screw-type implants: explorative in vitro pilot study in a porcine bone model. Beer A; Gahleitner A; Holm A; Birkfellner W; Homolka P Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):103-7. PubMed ID: 17224030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]