BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20212407)

  • 1. The use of short dental implants in clinical practice: literature review.
    Romeo E; Bivio A; Mosca D; Scanferla M; Ghisolfi M; Storelli S
    Minerva Stomatol; 2010; 59(1-2):23-31. PubMed ID: 20212407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of implant length and diameter on survival rates.
    Renouard F; Nisand D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17 Suppl 2():35-51. PubMed ID: 16968380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes.
    Chen ST; Wilson TG; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19 Suppl():12-25. PubMed ID: 15635942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical outcome of root-shaped dental implants of various diameters: 5-year results.
    Krennmair G; Seemann R; Schmidinger S; Ewers R; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):357-66. PubMed ID: 20369096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome?
    Quirynen M; Van Assche N; Botticelli D; Berglundh T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22 Suppl():203-23. PubMed ID: 18437797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A long-term retrospective study of two different implant surfaces placed after reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla using Le Fort I osteotomy and interpositional bone grafting.
    Marchetti C; Pieri F; Corinaldesi G; Degidi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(5):911-8. PubMed ID: 19014162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Success or failure of dental implants? A literature review with treatment considerations.
    Porter JA; von Fraunhofer JA
    Gen Dent; 2005; 53(6):423-32; quiz 433, 446. PubMed ID: 16366052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants.
    Carr AB; Choi YG; Eckert SE; Desjardins RP
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 12814315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies.
    das Neves FD; Fones D; Bernardes SR; do Prado CJ; Neto AJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 16519186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
    Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration (GBR) in three clinical scenarios prior to implant placement: a retrospective study of 35 patients 12 to 72 months after loading.
    Urban IA; Jovanovic SA; Lozada JL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):502-10. PubMed ID: 19587874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter retrospective study of ITI implant-supported posterior partial prosthesis in Jordan.
    Jebreen SE; Khraisat A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 17535332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dental implants placed in expanded narrow edentulous ridges with the Extension Crest device. A 1-3-year multicenter follow-up study.
    Chiapasco M; Ferrini F; Casentini P; Accardi S; Zaniboni M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Jun; 17(3):265-72. PubMed ID: 16672021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Long-term evaluation of osseointegrated implants placed in sites augmented with sinus floor elevation associated with vertical ridge augmentation: a retrospective study of 38 consecutive implants with 1- to 7-year follow-up.
    Simion M; Fontana F; Rasperini G; Maiorana C
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):208-21. PubMed ID: 15227769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A distinguishable observation between survival and success rate outcome of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in 5-10 years in function.
    Artzi Z; Carmeli G; Kozlovsky A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Feb; 17(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 16441789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.
    Strietzel FP; Reichart PA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites.
    Chen ST; Buser D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24 Suppl():186-217. PubMed ID: 19885446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
    Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long time follow up of implant therapy and treatment of peri-implantitis.
    Roos-Jansåker AM
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (188):7-66. PubMed ID: 17694834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Maxillary sinus lift for single implant-supported restorations: a clinical study.
    Krennmair G; Krainhöfner M; Schmid-Schwap M; Piehslinger E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 17622000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.