BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20213035)

  • 1. The reproducibility and responsiveness of a patient-specific approach: a new instrument in evaluation of treatment of temporomandibular disorders.
    Rollman A; Naeije M; Visscher CM
    J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 20213035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistically and clinically important change of pain scores in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorders.
    van Grootel RJ; van der Glas HW
    Eur J Pain; 2009 May; 13(5):506-10. PubMed ID: 18657456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimation of clinically important change for visual analog scales measuring chronic temporomandibular disorder pain.
    Emshoff R; Emshoff I; Bertram S
    J Orofac Pain; 2010; 24(3):262-9. PubMed ID: 20664827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reliability, validity, incidence and impact of temporormandibular pain disorders in adolescents.
    Nilsson IM
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (183):7-86. PubMed ID: 17506471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Translating the research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders into German: evaluation of content and process.
    John MT; Hirsch C; Reiber T; Dworkin Sf
    J Orofac Pain; 2006; 20(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 16483020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validity of the new Backache Index (BAI) in patients with low back pain.
    Farasyn A; Meeusen R
    Spine J; 2006; 6(5):565-71. PubMed ID: 16934729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized clinical trial of a tailored comprehensive care treatment program for temporomandibular disorders.
    Dworkin SF; Turner JA; Mancl L; Wilson L; Massoth D; Huggins KH; LeResche L; Truelove E
    J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(4):259-76. PubMed ID: 12455427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time courses of myofascial temporomandibular disorder complaints during a 12-month follow-up period.
    van Selms MK; Lobbezoo F; Naeije M
    J Orofac Pain; 2009; 23(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 19888486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The minimally important difference for the health assessment questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis clinical practice is smaller than in randomized controlled trials.
    Pope JE; Khanna D; Norrie D; Ouimet JM
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):254-9. PubMed ID: 19132791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term reliable change of pain scores in individual myogenous TMD patients.
    van Grootel RJ; van der Bilt A; van der Glas HW
    Eur J Pain; 2007 Aug; 11(6):635-43. PubMed ID: 17118682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability, validity, and clinical utility of the research diagnostic criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II Scales: depression, non-specific physical symptoms, and graded chronic pain.
    Dworkin SF; Sherman J; Mancl L; Ohrbach R; LeResche L; Truelove E
    J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(3):207-20. PubMed ID: 12221737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Interexaminer reliability and clinical validity of the temporomandibular index: a new outcome measure for temporomandibular disorders.
    Pehling J; Schiffman E; Look J; Shaefer J; Lenton P; Fricton J
    J Orofac Pain; 2002; 16(4):296-304. PubMed ID: 12455430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Responsiveness of visual analogue and McGill pain scale measures.
    Scrimshaw SV; Maher C
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2001 Oct; 24(8):501-4. PubMed ID: 11677548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The reliability and validity of self-reported temporomandibular disorder pain in adolescents.
    Nilsson IM; List T; Drangsholt M
    J Orofac Pain; 2006; 20(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 16708831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the responsiveness of measures of oral health-related quality of life.
    Locker D; Jokovic A; Clarke M
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2004 Feb; 32(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 14961835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predicting the outcome of a physical medicine treatment for temporomandibular disorder patients.
    Clark GT; Baba K; McCreary CP
    J Orofac Pain; 2009; 23(3):221-9. PubMed ID: 19639102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Chiropractic treatment of temporomandibular disorders using the activator adjusting instrument: a prospective case series.
    Devocht JW; Long CR; Zeitler DL; Schaeffer W
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2003 Sep; 26(7):421-5. PubMed ID: 12975628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual prediction of treatment outcome in patients with temporomandibular disorders. A quality improvement model.
    Sundqvist B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2007; (186):8-42, 1p preceding table of contents. PubMed ID: 17674664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.