BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20213709)

  • 1. Bias-reduced and separation-proof conditional logistic regression with small or sparse data sets.
    Heinze G; Puhr R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):770-7. PubMed ID: 20213709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Avoiding infinite estimates of time-dependent effects in small-sample survival studies.
    Heinze G; Dunkler D
    Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(30):6455-69. PubMed ID: 18816502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A weighted Cox model for modelling time-dependent exposures in the analysis of case-control studies.
    Leffondre K; Wynant W; Cao Z; Abrahamowicz M; Heinze G; Siemiatycki J
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):839-50. PubMed ID: 20213717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative investigation of methods for logistic regression with separated or nearly separated data.
    Heinze G
    Stat Med; 2006 Dec; 25(24):4216-26. PubMed ID: 16955543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bias reduction in conditional logistic regression.
    Sun JX; Sinha S; Wang S; Maiti T
    Stat Med; 2011 Feb; 30(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 21225897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of exact and asymptotic interval estimators in logistic analysis of matched case-control studies.
    Vollset SE; Hirji KF; Afifi AA
    Biometrics; 1991 Dec; 47(4):1311-25. PubMed ID: 1786321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On the potential of measurement error to induce differential bias on odds ratio estimates: an example from radon epidemiology.
    Heid IM; Küchenhoff H; Wellmann J; Gerken M; Kreienbrock L; Wichmann HE
    Stat Med; 2002 Nov; 21(21):3261-78. PubMed ID: 12375303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of smoking and radiotherapy on lung carcinoma in breast carcinoma survivors.
    Ford MB; Sigurdson AJ; Petrulis ES; Ng CS; Kemp B; Cooksley C; McNeese M; Selwyn BJ; Spitz MR; Bondy ML
    Cancer; 2003 Oct; 98(7):1457-64. PubMed ID: 14508833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Firth's logistic regression with rare events: accurate effect estimates and predictions?
    Puhr R; Heinze G; Nold M; Lusa L; Geroldinger A
    Stat Med; 2017 Jun; 36(14):2302-2317. PubMed ID: 28295456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Matched samples logistic regression in case-control studies with missing values: when to break the matches.
    Hansson L; Khamis HJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):595-607. PubMed ID: 18375456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of underlying risk as a source of heterogeneity in meta-analyses: a simulation study of Bayesian and frequentist implementations of three models.
    Dohoo I; Stryhn H; Sanchez J
    Prev Vet Med; 2007 Sep; 81(1-3):38-55. PubMed ID: 17477995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of matched case-control data with incomplete strata: applying longitudinal approaches.
    Lin IF; Lai MY; Chuang PH
    Epidemiology; 2007 Jul; 18(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 17525695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A permutation test for inference in logistic regression with small- and moderate-sized data sets.
    Potter DM
    Stat Med; 2005 Mar; 24(5):693-708. PubMed ID: 15515134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Exact logistic regression and its performance to SAS system].
    Liu QJ; Zeng Q; Zhou YR
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2003 Aug; 24(8):725-8. PubMed ID: 14521799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Full-likelihood approaches to misclassification of a binary exposure in matched case-control studies.
    Rice K
    Stat Med; 2003 Oct; 22(20):3177-94. PubMed ID: 14518022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bias reduction in logistic dose-response models.
    Wagler A
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 May; 21(3):405-22. PubMed ID: 21442516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of breast cancer radiotherapy and cigarette smoking on risk of second primary lung cancer.
    Kaufman EL; Jacobson JS; Hershman DL; Desai M; Neugut AI
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Jan; 26(3):392-8. PubMed ID: 18202415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential recall bias and spurious associations in case/control studies.
    Barry D
    Stat Med; 1996 Dec; 15(23):2603-16. PubMed ID: 8961466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.