342 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20213709)
21. Interval estimation of inverse dose-response.
Alho JM; Valtonen E
Biometrics; 1995 Jun; 51(2):491-501. PubMed ID: 7662838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Maximum likelihood estimation of the attributable fraction from logistic models.
Greenland S; Drescher K
Biometrics; 1993 Sep; 49(3):865-72. PubMed ID: 8241375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data.
Sweeting MJ; Sutton AJ; Lambert PC
Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(9):1351-75. PubMed ID: 15116347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparative study of the bias corrected estimates in logistic regression.
Maiti T; Pradhan V
Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Dec; 17(6):621-34. PubMed ID: 18375454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A solution to the problem of separation in logistic regression.
Heinze G; Schemper M
Stat Med; 2002 Aug; 21(16):2409-19. PubMed ID: 12210625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A shared frailty model for case-cohort samples: parent and offspring relations in an adoption study.
Petersen L; Sørensen TI; Andersen PK
Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):924-31. PubMed ID: 20213722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Haplotype association analysis of human disease traits using genotype data of unrelated individuals.
Tan Q; Christiansen L; Christensen K; Bathum L; Li S; Zhao JH; Kruse TA
Genet Res; 2005 Dec; 86(3):223-31. PubMed ID: 16454861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pseudolikelihood estimation of the Rasch model.
Smit A; Kelderman H
J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(1):513-23. PubMed ID: 11272599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Methods for interaction analyses using family-based case-control data: conditional logistic regression versus generalized estimating equations.
Hancock DB; Martin ER; Li YJ; Scott WK
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Dec; 31(8):883-93. PubMed ID: 17565751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Sampling for conditional inference on case-control data.
Chen Y; Dinwoodie IH; MacGibbon B
Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):845-55. PubMed ID: 17825015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The log multinomial regression model for nominal outcomes with more than two attributes.
Blizzard L; Hosmer DW
Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):889-902. PubMed ID: 17849384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Conditional likelihood methods for haplotype-based association analysis using matched case-control data.
Chen J; Rodriguez C
Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1099-107. PubMed ID: 18078481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Confidence intervals for multinomial logistic regression in sparse data.
Bull SB; Lewinger JP; Lee SS
Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):903-18. PubMed ID: 16489602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Analysis of matched case-control data with multiple ordered disease states: possible choices and comparisons.
Mukherjee B; Liu I; Sinha S
Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(17):3240-57. PubMed ID: 17206600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A hierarchical model for binary data with dependence between the design and outcome success probabilities.
Todem D; Williams KP
Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2967-88. PubMed ID: 19642075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Wood dust exposure and the association with lung cancer risk.
Barcenas CH; Delclos GL; El-Zein R; Tortolero-Luna G; Whitehead LW; Spitz MR
Am J Ind Med; 2005 Apr; 47(4):349-57. PubMed ID: 15776474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Bias correction of risk estimates in vaccine safety studies with rare adverse events using a self-controlled case series design.
Zeng C; Newcomer SR; Glanz JM; Shoup JA; Daley MF; Hambidge SJ; Xu S
Am J Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 178(12):1750-9. PubMed ID: 24327463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. An application of a weighting method to adjust for nonresponse in standardized incidence ratio analysis of cohort studies.
Rao RS; Sigurdson AJ; Doody MM; Graubard BI
Ann Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 15(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 15652718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accounting for haplotype uncertainty in matched association studies: a comparison of simple and flexible techniques.
Kraft P; Cox DG; Paynter RA; Hunter D; De Vivo I
Genet Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 28(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 15637718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
