These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20213718)

  • 1. Comparisons of minimization and Atkinson's algorithm.
    Senn S; Anisimov VV; Fedorov VV
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):721-30. PubMed ID: 20213718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Randomization by minimization for unbalanced treatment allocation.
    Han B; Enas NH; McEntegart D
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(27):3329-46. PubMed ID: 19739238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of simulation to compare the performance of minimization with stratified blocked randomization.
    Toorawa R; Adena M; Donovan M; Jones S; Conlon J
    Pharm Stat; 2009; 8(4):264-78. PubMed ID: 18756580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic balancing randomization in controlled clinical trials.
    Heritier S; Gebski V; Pillai A
    Stat Med; 2005 Dec; 24(24):3729-41. PubMed ID: 16320277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistical comparison of random allocation methods in cancer clinical trials.
    Hagino A; Hamada C; Yoshimura I; Ohashi Y; Sakamoto J; Nakazato H
    Control Clin Trials; 2004 Dec; 25(6):572-84. PubMed ID: 15588744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Permutation test following covariate-adaptive randomization in randomized controlled trials.
    Hasegawa T; Tango T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(1):106-19. PubMed ID: 19127470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. New algorithm for treatment allocation reduced selection bias and loss of power in small trials.
    Hofmeijer J; Anema PC; van der Tweel I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 61(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 18177784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Studywise minimization: a treatment allocation method that improves balance among treatment groups and makes allocation unpredictable.
    Perry M; Faes M; Reelick MF; Olde Rikkert MG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Oct; 63(10):1118-22. PubMed ID: 20304606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequentially adjusted randomization to force balance in controlled trials with unknown prevalence of covariates: application to alcoholism research.
    Müller MJ; Scheurich A; Wetzel H; Szegedi A; Hautzinger M
    Alcohol Alcohol; 2005; 40(2):124-31. PubMed ID: 15642723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hierarchical model for binary data with dependence between the design and outcome success probabilities.
    Todem D; Williams KP
    Stat Med; 2009 Oct; 28(24):2967-88. PubMed ID: 19642075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Longitudinal and repeated cross-sectional cluster-randomization designs using mixed effects regression for binary outcomes: bias and coverage of frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Localio AR; Berlin JA; Have TR
    Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(16):2720-36. PubMed ID: 16345043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Balancing multiple baseline characteristics in randomized clinical trials.
    Su Z
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2011 Jul; 32(4):547-50. PubMed ID: 21382510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of stratification and adaptive methods for treatment allocation in an acute stroke clinical trial.
    Weir CJ; Lees KR
    Stat Med; 2003 Mar; 22(5):705-26. PubMed ID: 12587101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using fractional exhaled nitric oxide to guide asthma therapy: design and methodological issues for ASthma TReatment ALgorithm studies.
    Gibson PG
    Clin Exp Allergy; 2009 Apr; 39(4):478-90. PubMed ID: 19260871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of randomization techniques for clinical trials with data from the HOMERUS-trial.
    Verberk WJ; Kroon AA; Kessels AG; Nelemans PJ; Van Ree JW; Lenders JW; Thien T; Bakx JC; Van Montfrans GA; Smit AJ; Beltman FW; De Leeuw PW
    Blood Press; 2005; 14(5):306-14. PubMed ID: 16257877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementation and experience of a web-based allocation system with Pocock and Simon's minimization methods.
    Cai HW; Xia JL; Gao DH; Cao XM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Nov; 31(6):510-3. PubMed ID: 20674777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interpreting clinical trial results of patient-perceived onset of effect in asthma: methods and results of a Delphi panel.
    Harding G; Leidy NK; Meddis D; Kleinman L; Wagner S; O'Brien CD
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Jun; 25(6):1563-71. PubMed ID: 19445651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interval estimation of the risk difference in non-compliance randomized trials with repeated binary measurements.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3140-56. PubMed ID: 17177272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bounds on causal effects in randomized trials with noncompliance under monotonicity assumptions about covariates.
    Chiba Y
    Stat Med; 2009 Nov; 28(26):3249-59. PubMed ID: 19777494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.