These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20213718)

  • 21. Bayesian inference for randomized clinical trials with treatment failures.
    Shaffer ML; Chinchilli VM
    Stat Med; 2004 Apr; 23(8):1215-28. PubMed ID: 15083479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Balancing continuous covariates based on Kernel densities.
    Ma Z; Hu F
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2013 Mar; 34(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 23270935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Sequential balancing: a simple method for treatment allocation in clinical trials.
    Borm GF; Hoogendoorn EH; den Heijer M; Zielhuis GA
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Dec; 26(6):637-45. PubMed ID: 16226925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomization with a posteriori constraints: description and properties.
    Gicquel S; Marion-Gallois R
    Stat Med; 2007 Nov; 26(27):5033-45. PubMed ID: 17721873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A pencil beam algorithm for intensity modulated proton therapy derived from Monte Carlo simulations.
    Soukup M; Fippel M; Alber M
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(21):5089-104. PubMed ID: 16237243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A generic minimization random allocation and blinding system on web.
    Cai H; Xia J; Xu D; Gao D; Yan Y
    J Biomed Inform; 2006 Dec; 39(6):706-19. PubMed ID: 16616696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A constant-time kinetic Monte Carlo algorithm for simulation of large biochemical reaction networks.
    Slepoy A; Thompson AP; Plimpton SJ
    J Chem Phys; 2008 May; 128(20):205101. PubMed ID: 18513044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adjusting for observable selection bias in block randomized trials.
    Ivanova A; Barrier RC; Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(10):1537-46. PubMed ID: 15723426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Including multiple imputation in a sensitivity analysis for clinical trials with treatment failures.
    Shaffer ML; Chinchilli VM
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 16877049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE.
    Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I
    Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Collapsed cone convolution and analytical anisotropic algorithm dose calculations compared to VMC++ Monte Carlo simulations in clinical cases.
    Hasenbalg F; Neuenschwander H; Mini R; Born EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3679-91. PubMed ID: 17664570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy.
    Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Generalized method for adaptive randomization in clinical trials.
    Russell D; Hoare ZS; Whitaker R; Whitaker CJ; Russell IT
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(9):922-34. PubMed ID: 21284014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analysing sequential events in clinical trials.
    Salter A; Raab G; Day S
    Clin Trials; 2006; 3(5):421-30. PubMed ID: 17060216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Procedures for testing the homogeneity of relative difference in sparse data.
    Lui KJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Feb; 25(4):685-97. PubMed ID: 16007573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimating adjusted risk difference (RD) and number needed to treat (NNT) measures in the Cox regression model.
    Laubender RP; Bender R
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):851-9. PubMed ID: 20213710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An efficient framework for photon Monte Carlo treatment planning.
    Fix MK; Manser P; Frei D; Volken W; Mini R; Born EJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 52(19):N425-37. PubMed ID: 17881793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A Monte Carlo approach for change-point detection in the Cox proportional hazards model.
    Liu M; Lu W; Shao Y
    Stat Med; 2008 Aug; 27(19):3894-909. PubMed ID: 18254131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Efficiency of investigators in recruitment of patients for clinical trials: apropos of a multinational study].
    Dal-Ré R; Ortega R; Espada J
    Med Clin (Barc); 1998 Apr; 110(14):521-3. PubMed ID: 9646264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.