203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20215669)
1. Treatment effects produced by preorthodontic trainer appliance in patients with class II division I malocclusion.
Das UM; Reddy D
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2010; 28(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 20215669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effects of early preorthodontic trainer treatment on Class II, division 1 patients.
Usumez S; Uysal T; Sari Z; Basciftci FA; Karaman AI; Guray E
Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):605-9. PubMed ID: 15529493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion.
Rodrigues de Almeida M; Castanha Henriques JF; Rodrigues de Almeida R; Ursi W
Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 12401050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skeletal and dental components of Class II correction with the bionator and removable headgear splint appliances.
Martins RP; da Rosa Martins JC; Martins LP; Buschang PH
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Dec; 134(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 19061799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analysis of the corrective contribution in activator treatment.
Cozza P; De Toffol L; Iacopini L
Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):741-8. PubMed ID: 15673134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of the reciprocal mini-chin cup appliance.
Aslan BI; Dinçer M
Eur J Orthod; 2008 Feb; 30(1):80-8. PubMed ID: 18276929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of double-plate appliance and facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.
Ucem TT; Ucuncü N; Yüksel S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Dec; 126(6):672-9. PubMed ID: 15592214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment and posttreatment effects of a facial mask combined with a bite-block appliance in Class III malocclusion.
Cozza P; Baccetti T; Mucedero M; Pavoni C; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Sep; 138(3):300-10. PubMed ID: 20816299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Skeletal and dental effects of a mini maxillary protraction appliance.
Altug Z; Arslan AD
Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 16637712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion.
Jamilian A; Showkatbakhsh R; Amiri SS
Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 20956385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes concurrent to use of Twin Block appliance in class II division I cases with a deficient mandible: a cephalometric study.
Sharma AK; Sachdev V; Singla A; Kirtaniya BC
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2012; 30(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 23263425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Short-term skeletal and dental effects of the Xbow appliance as measured on lateral cephalograms.
Flores-Mir C; Barnett G; Higgins DW; Heo G; Major PW
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):822-32. PubMed ID: 19962605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving Class II malocclusion as a side-effect of rapid maxillary expansion: a prospective clinical study.
Guest SS; McNamara JA; Baccetti T; Franchi L
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):582-91. PubMed ID: 21055598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dentoskeletal effects of the Bite-Jumping Appliance and the Twin-Block Appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: a randomized controlled trial.
Burhan AS; Nawaya FR
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Jun; 37(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 25296729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluating the effect of Sabbagh Universal Spring during treatment of growing class II malocclusions.
Hanandeh BA; El-Bialy AA
Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2010; 21(4):13-24. PubMed ID: 21314084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects of fixed and removable functional appliances on the skeletal and dentoalveolar structures.
Bilgiç F; Hamamci O; Başaran G
Aust Orthod J; 2011 Nov; 27(2):110-6. PubMed ID: 22372266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An evaluation of maxillary and mandibular rotational responses with the Clark twin block appliance.
Lau EY; Sampson WJ; Townsend GC; Hughes T
Aust Orthod J; 2009 May; 25(1):48-58. PubMed ID: 19634464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Initial and late treatment effects of headgear-Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement.
Hägg U; Du X; Rabie AB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Nov; 122(5):477-85. PubMed ID: 12439475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue effects caused by herbst and mandibular protraction appliances in the treatment of mandibular Class II malocclusions.
Alves PF; Oliveira AG
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(1):e1-19. PubMed ID: 19641760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
