These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20216342)
1. The restoration of lumbar intervertebral disc load distribution: a comparison of three nucleus replacement technologies. Dahl MC; Ahrens M; Sherman JE; Martz EO Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jul; 35(15):1445-53. PubMed ID: 20216342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of nucleus replacement device properties on lumbar spine mechanics. Rundell SA; Guerin HL; Auerbach JD; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2022-32. PubMed ID: 19730210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains. Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Restoration of compressive loading properties of lumbar discs with a nucleus implant-a finite element analysis study. Strange DG; Fisher ST; Boughton PC; Kishen TJ; Diwan AD Spine J; 2010 Jul; 10(7):602-9. PubMed ID: 20547110 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis. Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model. Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement. Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities. McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fill of the nucleus cavity affects mechanical stability in compression, bending, and torsion of a spine segment, which has undergone nucleus replacement. Arthur A; Cannella M; Keane M; Singhatat W; Vresilovic E; Marcolongo M Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(11):1128-35. PubMed ID: 20473120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study. Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading. Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of fusion-bone stiffness on the mechanical behavior of the lumbar spine after vertebral body replacement. Rohlmann A; Zander T; Bergmann G Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2006 Mar; 21(3):221-7. PubMed ID: 16356613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cervical disc replacement-porous coated motion prosthesis: a comparative biomechanical analysis showing the key role of the posterior longitudinal ligament. McAfee PC; Cunningham B; Dmitriev A; Hu N; Woo Kim S; Cappuccino A; Pimenta L Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S176-85. PubMed ID: 14560189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Effect of prosthetic nucleus pulposus replacement on stress distributions of lumbar disc endplate]. Qu DB; Zhao L; Jin DD Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Mar; 46(5):354-6. PubMed ID: 18785531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion. Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dynamic bulging of intervertebral discs in the degenerative lumbar spine. Zou J; Yang H; Miyazaki M; Morishita Y; Wei F; McGovern S; Wang JC Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(23):2545-50. PubMed ID: 19841611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of implant size and device keel on vertebral compression properties in lumbar total disc replacement. Auerbach JD; Ballester CM; Hammond F; Carine ET; Balderston RA; Elliott DM Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):333-40. PubMed ID: 20362251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validated finite element analysis of the maverick total disc prosthesis. Le Huec JC; Lafage V; Bonnet X; Lavaste F; Josse L; Liu M; Skalli W J Spinal Disord Tech; 2010 Jun; 23(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 20068471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Vadapalli S; Sairyo K; Goel VK; Robon M; Biyani A; Khandha A; Ebraheim NA Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(26):E992-8. PubMed ID: 17172990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]