These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20216414)

  • 1. Cumulative live-birth rates after assisted reproductive technology.
    Moragianni VA; Penzias AS
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jun; 22(3):189-92. PubMed ID: 20216414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. One last chance for pregnancy: a review of 2,705 in vitro fertilization cycles initiated in women age 40 years and above.
    Klipstein S; Regan M; Ryley DA; Goldman MB; Alper MM; Reindollar RH
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Aug; 84(2):435-45. PubMed ID: 16084887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Final ART success rates: a 10 years survey.
    Gnoth C; Maxrath B; Skonieczny T; Friol K; Godehardt E; Tigges J
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Aug; 26(8):2239-46. PubMed ID: 21659314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cumulative live-birth rates after in vitro fertilization.
    Malizia BA; Hacker MR; Penzias AS
    N Engl J Med; 2009 Jan; 360(3):236-43. PubMed ID: 19144939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cumulative live-birth rates per total number of embryos needed to reach newborn in consecutive in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles: a new approach to measuring the likelihood of IVF success.
    Garrido N; Bellver J; Remohí J; Simón C; Pellicer A
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jul; 96(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 21621770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproductive technologies in Canada: 2005 results from the Canadian Assisted Reproductive Technologies Register.
    Gunby J; Bissonnette F; Librach C; Cowan L;
    Fertil Steril; 2009 May; 91(5):1721-30. PubMed ID: 18423460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Factors affecting the cumulative live birth rate in IVF cycles. Retrospective analysis of a 1001 couples cohort].
    Pouly JL; Ouziel L; Gremeau AS; De Mouzon J; Janny L; Vignancour S; Dejou L; Brugnon F
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2012 Apr; 40(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 22326180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preimplantation genetic screening does not improve delivery rate in women under the age of 36 following single-embryo transfer.
    Staessen C; Verpoest W; Donoso P; Haentjens P; Van der Elst J; Liebaers I; Devroey P
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2818-25. PubMed ID: 18930977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. No beneficial effect of preimplantation genetic screening in women of advanced maternal age with a high risk for embryonic aneuploidy.
    Twisk M; Mastenbroek S; Hoek A; Heineman MJ; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Repping S; Korevaar JC
    Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2813-7. PubMed ID: 18567895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis.
    Oktay K; Cil AP; Bang H
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Jul; 86(1):70-80. PubMed ID: 16818031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple gestation pregnancy. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group.
    Hum Reprod; 2000 Aug; 15(8):1856-64. PubMed ID: 10920117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assisted reproductive technology : experience with IVF/ICSI.
    Rizvi JH; Zuberi NF; Bhatti S; Bana M; Virk S; Nadir S; Kidwai A; Tahir N
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 May; 14(5):270-3. PubMed ID: 15225453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Embryo selection in IVF.
    Mastenbroek S; van der Veen F; Aflatoonian A; Shapiro B; Bossuyt P; Repping S
    Hum Reprod; 2011 May; 26(5):964-6. PubMed ID: 21372045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of air quality on assisted human reproduction.
    Legro RS; Sauer MV; Mottla GL; Richter KS; Li X; Dodson WC; Liao D
    Hum Reprod; 2010 May; 25(5):1317-24. PubMed ID: 20228391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The cumulative probability of liveborn multiples after in vitro fertilization: a cohort study of more than 10,000 women.
    Malizia BA; Dodge LE; Penzias AS; Hacker MR
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Feb; 99(2):393-9. PubMed ID: 23141053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing multiple pregnancy in assisted reproduction technology: towards a policy of single blastocyst transfer in younger women.
    Kalu E; Thum MY; Abdalla H
    BJOG; 2008 Aug; 115(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 18518874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2003 results from the Canadian ART Register.
    Gunby J; Daya S;
    Fertil Steril; 2007 Sep; 88(3):550-9. PubMed ID: 17303133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hepatitis B infection and outcomes of in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment.
    Lam PM; Suen SH; Lao TT; Cheung LP; Leung TY; Haines C
    Fertil Steril; 2010 Feb; 93(2):480-5. PubMed ID: 19324342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cumulative live birth rates in cohorts of patients treated with in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Witsenburg C; Dieben S; Van der Westerlaken L; Verburg H; Naaktgeboren N
    Fertil Steril; 2005 Jul; 84(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 16009164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reducing twin pregnancy rates after IVF--elective single embryo transfer (eSET).
    Milne P; Cottell E; Allen C; Spillane H; Vasallo J; Wingfield M
    Ir Med J; 2010 Jan; 103(1):9-11. PubMed ID: 20222385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.