These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20216853)
1. Design Of nonimaging concentrators as second stages in tandem with image-forming first-Stage concentrators. Winston R; Welford WT Appl Opt; 1980 Feb; 19(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 20216853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. New method of design of nonimaging concentrators. Miñano JC; González JC Appl Opt; 1992 Jun; 31(16):3051-60. PubMed ID: 20725250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thermodynamic efficiency of solar concentrators. Shatz N; Bortz J; Winston R Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18(9):A5-16. PubMed ID: 20607882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Thermodynamic efficiency of solar concentrators. Shatz N; Bortz J; Winston R Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18 Suppl 1():A5-A16. PubMed ID: 20588573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optics of two-stage photovoltaic concentrators with dielectric second stages. Ning X; O'Gallagher J; Winston R Appl Opt; 1987 Apr; 26(7):1207-12. PubMed ID: 20454302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ideal flux field dielectric concentrators. García-Botella A Appl Opt; 2011 Oct; 50(28):5357-60. PubMed ID: 22016201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tailored edge-ray concentrators as ideal second stages for Fresnel reflectors. Gordon JM; Ries H Appl Opt; 1993 May; 32(13):2243-51. PubMed ID: 20820374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Two-stage solar concentrators based on parabolic troughs: asymmetric versus symmetric designs. Schmitz M; Cooper T; Ambrosetti G; Steinfeld A Appl Opt; 2015 Nov; 54(33):9709-21. PubMed ID: 26836527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ideal second stages in tandem with parabolic concentrators. Kritchman EM Appl Opt; 1982 Apr; 21(7):1307-9. PubMed ID: 20389849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Complementary construction of ideal nonimaging concentrators and its applications. Gordon JM Appl Opt; 1996 Oct; 35(28):5677-82. PubMed ID: 21127575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Pushing concentration of stationary solar concentrators to the limit. Winston R; Zhang W Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18 Suppl 1():A64-72. PubMed ID: 20588575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pushing concentration of stationary solar concentrators to the limit. Winston R; Zhang W Opt Express; 2010 Apr; 18(9):A64-72. PubMed ID: 20607887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reduction of intensity variations on the absorbers of ideal flux concentrators. Greenman P Appl Opt; 1980 Aug; 19(16):2812-21. PubMed ID: 20234511 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optical performance at the thermodynamic limit with tailored imaging designs. Gordon JM; Feuermann D Appl Opt; 2005 Apr; 44(12):2327-31. PubMed ID: 15861838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multimode analysis of compound parabolic concentrators with flat absorber. Fraidenraich N; Salcedo IH Appl Opt; 1993 Jun; 32(16):2891-900. PubMed ID: 20829892 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance comparison of four kinds of flat nonimaging Fresnel lenses made of polycarbonates and polymethyl methacrylate for concentrated photovoltaics. Languy F; Habraken S Opt Lett; 2011 Jul; 36(14):2743-5. PubMed ID: 21765528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optical designs for ultrahigh-flux infrared and solar energy collection: monolithic dielectric tailored edge-ray concentrators. Friedman RP; Gordon JM Appl Opt; 1996 Dec; 35(34):6684-91. PubMed ID: 21151248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]