131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20216990)
1. External quality assessment (EQA) for CoaguChek monitors.
Jespersen J; Poller L; van den Besselaar AM; van der Meer FJ; Palareti G; Tripodi A; Shiach C; Keown M; Ibrahim S
Thromb Haemost; 2010 May; 103(5):936-41. PubMed ID: 20216990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A national field study of quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care testing prothrombin time monitors.
Meijer P; Kluft C; Poller L; van der Meer FJ; Keown M; Ibrahim S; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Jespersen J
Am J Clin Pathol; 2006 Nov; 126(5):756-61. PubMed ID: 17050073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality assurance program for whole blood prothrombin time-international normalized ratio point-of-care monitors used for patient self-testing to control oral anticoagulation.
Tripodi A; Bressi C; Carpenedo M; Chantarangkul V; Clerici M; Mannucci PM
Thromb Res; 2004; 113(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 15081563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. European concerted action on anticoagulation. Minimum numbers of lyophilized plasma samples for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care whole blood prothrombin time monitors.
Poller L; Keown M; Chauhan N; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Jespersen J; Shiach C
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Feb; 119(2):232-40. PubMed ID: 12579993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality assessment of CoaguChek point-of-care prothrombin time monitors: comparison of the European community-approved procedure and conventional external quality assessment.
Poller L; Keown M; Ibrahim SA; van der Meer FJ; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Jespersen J; Meijer P; Kluft C;
Clin Chem; 2006 Oct; 52(10):1843-7. PubMed ID: 16998117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Point-of-care (POCT) prothrombin time monitors: is a periodical control of their performance useful?
Barcellona D; Fenu L; Cornacchini S; Marongiu F
Thromb Res; 2009 Mar; 123(5):775-9. PubMed ID: 18814903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Establishing an external quality assessment scheme for point-of-care international normalized ratio in Thailand.
Tientadakul P; Chuntarut A
Int J Lab Hematol; 2015 Aug; 37(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 25529559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between CoaguChek S- and Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring anticoagulant therapy.
Jonsson M; Hillarp A; Svensson P
Thromb Res; 2004; 114(2):83-9. PubMed ID: 15306149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance evaluation of the new CoaguChek XS system compared with the established CoaguChek system by patients experienced in INR-self management.
Braun S; Watzke H; Hasenkam JM; Schwab M; Wolf T; Dovifat C; Völler H
Thromb Haemost; 2007 Feb; 97(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 17264962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Self-monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children.
Paioni P; Kroiss S; Kägi E; Bergsträsser E; Fasnacht M; Bauersfeld U; Schmugge M; Albisetti M
Acta Haematol; 2009; 122(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19816011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Point-of-care monitoring of vitamin K-antagonists: validation of CoaguChek XS test strips with International Standard thromboplastin.
van den Besselaar AM; Péquériaux NC; Ebben M; van der Feest J; de Jong K; Ganzeboom MB; van Ooijen J; Postema F; Witteveen E; van der Meer FJ
J Clin Pathol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1031-5. PubMed ID: 22859395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Results of the performance verification of the CoaguChek XS system.
Plesch W; Wolf T; Breitenbeck N; Dikkeschei LD; Cervero A; Perez PL; van den Besselaar AM
Thromb Res; 2008; 123(2):381-9. PubMed ID: 18585761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Point-of-care monitoring of oral anticoagulation therapy in children. Comparison of the CoaguChek XS system with venous INR and venous INR using an International Reference Thromboplastin preparation (rTF/95).
Greenway A; Ignjatovic V; Summerhayes R; Newall F; Burgess J; DeRosa L; Monagle P
Thromb Haemost; 2009 Jul; 102(1):159-65. PubMed ID: 19572081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The reliability of point-of-care prothrombin time testing. A comparison of CoaguChek S and XS INR measurements with hospital laboratory monitoring.
Ryan F; O'Shea S; Byrne S
Int J Lab Hematol; 2010 Feb; 32(1 Pt 1):e26-33. PubMed ID: 19032373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. European concerted action on anticoagulation. Quality assessment of the CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC point-of-care whole-blood prothrombin time monitors.
Poller L; Keown M; Chauhan N; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Shiach C; Jespersen J
Clin Chem; 2004 Mar; 50(3):537-44. PubMed ID: 14709449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation--comparison of fresh plasma and whole blood multicentre ISI calibrations of CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC whole blood prothrombin time point-of-care monitors.
Poller L; Keown M; Chauhan N; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Shiach C; Jespersen J;
Thromb Haemost; 2002 May; 87(5):859-66. PubMed ID: 12038790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of Quick/INR values of whole capillary blood (CoaguChek Plus) and venous citrate plasma in patients with and without oral anticoagulation].
Burri S; Demarmels Biasiutti F; Lämmle B; Wuillemin WA
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1998 Oct; 128(44):1723-9. PubMed ID: 9846345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and evaluation of a Point-of-care device (CoaguChek XS) to Owren-type prothrombin time assay for monitoring of oral anticoagulant therapy with warfarin.
Wieloch M; Hillarp A; Strandberg K; Nilsson C; Svensson PJ
Thromb Res; 2009 Jul; 124(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 19423152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA). An assessment of lyophilised plasmas for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS whole blood prothrombin time monitors.
Poller L; Keown M; Chauhan N; van den Besselaar AM; Tripodi A; Shiach C; Jespersen J
J Clin Pathol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 12560389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External quality assessment of prothrombin time: the split-sample model compared with external quality assessment with commercial control material.
Sølvik UØ; Stavelin A; Christensen NG; Sandberg S
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(4):337-49. PubMed ID: 16777762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
