These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 20218508)

  • 1. Off-target loss in ornamental nurseries with different spray techniques.
    Zhu H; Derksen RC; Krause CR; Zondag RH
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 20218508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of the entrained air and initial droplet velocity on the release height parameter of a Gaussian spray drift model.
    Stainier C; Destain MF; Schiffers B; Lebeau F
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):197-200. PubMed ID: 17390793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of realtime spray drift using RTDrift Gaussian advection-diffusion model.
    Lebeau F; Verstraete A; Schiffers B; Destain MF
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 20218507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classification of spray nozzles based on droplet size distributions and wind tunnel tests.
    De Schamphelerie M; Spanoghe P; Nuyttens D; Baetens K; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Van der Meeren P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2006; 71(2 Pt A):201-7. PubMed ID: 17390794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 2: wind tunnel experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):757-61. PubMed ID: 19226825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of air support on droplet characteristics and spray drift.
    Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2007; 72(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18399426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 3: field drift experiments.
    Nuyttens D; De Schampheleire M; Baetens K; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):763-7. PubMed ID: 19226826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 1: PDPA laser based droplet characterisation.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Dekeyser D; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):749-56. PubMed ID: 19226824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct and indirect drift assessment means. Part 4: a comparative study.
    Nuyttens D; Baetens K; De Schampheleire M; Sonck B
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):769-74. PubMed ID: 19226827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of collectors of airborne spray drift. Experiments in a wind tunnel and field measurements.
    Arvidsson T; Bergström L; Kreuger J
    Pest Manag Sci; 2011 Jun; 67(6):725-33. PubMed ID: 21445941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spray drift as affected by meteorological conditions.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):947-59. PubMed ID: 16628942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Drift of 10 herbicides after tractor spray application. 2. Primary drift (droplet drift).
    Carlsen SC; Spliid NH; Svensmark B
    Chemosphere; 2006 Jul; 64(5):778-86. PubMed ID: 16337986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 1: wind tunnel experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Cornelis W; Gabriels D; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):719-22. PubMed ID: 19226819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Field experiment on spray drift: deposition and airborne drift during application to a winter wheat crop.
    Wolters A; Linnemann V; van de Zande JC; Vereecken H
    Sci Total Environ; 2008 Nov; 405(1-3):269-77. PubMed ID: 18723207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A pdpa laser-based measuring set-up for the characterisation of spray nozzles.
    Nuyttens D; Sonck B; de Schampheleire M; Steurbaut W; Baetens K; Verboven P; Nicolaï B; Ramon H
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2005; 70(4):1023-35. PubMed ID: 16628951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spray droplet size, drift potential, and risks to nontarget organisms from aerially applied glyphosate for coca control in Colombia.
    Hewitt AJ; Solomon KR; Marshall EJ
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2009; 72(15-16):921-9. PubMed ID: 19672760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spray drift reduction under Southern European conditions: a pilot study in the Ecopest Project in Greece.
    Kasiotis KM; Glass CR; Tsakirakis AN; Machera K
    Sci Total Environ; 2014 May; 479-480():132-7. PubMed ID: 24561292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interception of spray drift by border structures. Part 2: field experiments.
    De Schampheleire M; Nuyttens D; Dekeyser D; Verboven P; Spanoghe P
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2008; 73(4):723-7. PubMed ID: 19226820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Drift-reducing nozzles and their biological efficacy.
    Nuyttens D; Dhoop M; De Blauwer V; Hermann O; Hubrechts W; Mestdagh I; Dekeyser D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 20218510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optimization of the spray application technology in bay laurel (Laurus nobilis).
    Nuyttens D; Braekman P; Foque D
    Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci; 2009; 74(1):85-90. PubMed ID: 20218514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.